Sujet : Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed?
De : shouman (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Radey Shouman)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 04. Feb 2025, 17:58:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None of the above
Message-ID : <87jza5d4uf.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Catrike Ryder <
Soloman@old.bikers.org> writes:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:51:37 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I notice that practice has faded. We have posts that roll on for screen
after screen after screen, six or seven responses deep. But trimming is
still a good idea. As always, a person can scroll upward to see what was
posted. Usenet doesn't forget.
>
Snipping works well for people who don't have the backbone to reply to
all that the original poster said.
Responding to all that the previous poster said, which is what I assume
you meant, would result in a literally exponential explosion of verbiage.
That way lies madness, no one has that sort of time.
Note that your reply was a single sentence that does not attempt to
reply to all that Mr. Krygowski said. Nothing wrong with that, but the
sentence refutes itself.
--