Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed?

On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 11:58:32 -0500, Radey Shouman
<shouman@comcast.net> wrote:

Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> writes:
>

On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:51:37 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:

>
[ ... ]
>

I notice that practice has faded. We have posts that roll on for screen
after screen after screen, six or seven responses deep. But trimming is
still a good idea. As always, a person can scroll upward to see what was
posted. Usenet doesn't forget.

>
Snipping works well for people who don't have the backbone to reply to
all that the original poster said.

>
Responding to all that the previous poster said, which is what I assume
you meant, would result in a literally exponential explosion of verbiage.
That way lies madness, no one has that sort of time.
>
Note that your reply was a single sentence that does not attempt to
reply to all that Mr. Krygowski said.  Nothing wrong with that, but the
sentence refutes itself.

No, it was not a single sentence and he not only snipped most of that
post, he snipped that inirtioal sentence.

He had previously claimed that I was picking on him because he posted
that he did things I could not do. I asked him to document some of
things and he qiuickly snipped and ran away.

--
C'est bon
Soloman