Re: An offensive defense

On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 16:39:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Wed Feb 5 08:36:39 2025 AMuzi  wrote:

https://nypost.com/2025/02/05/sports/driver-says-nhl-star-johnny-gaudreau-and-his-brother-had-been-drinking-before-fatal-accident/

>
They could call that the "Liebermann defense". Jeff alleges that he is never wrong,

That's not what I said.  I said that YOU were always wrong (with a few
minor exceptions).  When describing myself, I indicated that I have
made a few mistakes and usually apologized to the group for making
mistakes.

just as a drunk driver is claiming that his crimial act of driving drunk is not a crime if others are also doing it legally on vehicles that do not offer a danger to others.

What manner of vehicles "do not offer a danger to others" when
operated by an intoxicated driver?  I hope you don't mean a self
driving car, where blaming the car for accidents has not succeeded in
the courts.

"Drinking and Self-Driving Cars"
<https://ggrmlawfirm.com/blog/personal-injury/auto-accidents/drinking-and-self-driving-cars/>
"There is no exception for drunk driving and driverless cars."


--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558