Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed?

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 03:19:34 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:12:18 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:57:22 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:53:20 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:44:59 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
>

On 2/6/2025 8:22 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

 
Need I repeat his nonsense about having a close friend who designed
guns for Ruger?

>
I gave documentation on that to some folks here who might have
legitimate interests in it, and would be civilized enough not to disturb
my friend's privacy.
>
You don't qualify.

>
<LOL>

>
Strange, I am always interested in guns and don't remember any
documentation being given. Securest documentation?
>
As an aside Ruger has always begged about how their guns were designed
or developed. Why secrets?

>
>
Spelling Checker failed again -"Secret Documentation" :-)

>
Supposedly, according Krygowski's bullshit, the man was already well
know enough to have his name published in a magazine article, but
naming him in a obscure Usenet group would violate his privacy.
>
"He designed a gun for Ruger, doing the entire design pretty much
solo. It included some features for which he received a patent. No, I
won't violate his privacy, but I've seen his name (related to this) in
a magazine article."
>
--Frank Krygowski
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/Zu_BtGgv8Fs/m/K7AvAhPZBQAJ

If the guy received a patent how does Frank think he is going to
protect the bloke's privacy as patents are freely available.

In fumblingly around on the  web I discovered that
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/lie
 there are 141 ways to denote a liar.
and only 40 ways to denote the truth.
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/tell-the-truth
(:-)

I also discovered two conventional responses to Frankie's posts:

'I believe there might be some discrepancies between what you're
saying and the facts. '

'It seems that the information provided may not fully align with the
actual circumstances. '
(:-)
--
Cheers,

John B.