Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed?

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:05:55 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 03:19:34 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 09:12:18 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 08:57:22 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:53:20 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 09:44:59 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
>

On 2/6/2025 8:22 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

 
Need I repeat his nonsense about having a close friend who designed
guns for Ruger?

>
I gave documentation on that to some folks here who might have
legitimate interests in it, and would be civilized enough not to disturb
my friend's privacy.
>
You don't qualify.

>
<LOL>

>
Strange, I am always interested in guns and don't remember any
documentation being given. Securest documentation?
>
As an aside Ruger has always begged about how their guns were designed
or developed. Why secrets?

>
>
Spelling Checker failed again -"Secret Documentation" :-)

>
Supposedly, according Krygowski's bullshit, the man was already well
know enough to have his name published in a magazine article, but
naming him in a obscure Usenet group would violate his privacy.
>
"He designed a gun for Ruger, doing the entire design pretty much
solo. It included some features for which he received a patent. No, I
won't violate his privacy, but I've seen his name (related to this) in
a magazine article."
>
--Frank Krygowski
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/Zu_BtGgv8Fs/m/K7AvAhPZBQAJ

>
>
If the guy received a patent how does Frank think he is going to
protect the bloke's privacy as patents are freely available.
>
In fumblingly around on the  web I discovered that
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/lie
there are 141 ways to denote a liar.
and only 40 ways to denote the truth.
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/tell-the-truth
(:-)
>
I also discovered two conventional responses to Frankie's posts:
>
'I believe there might be some discrepancies between what you're
saying and the facts. '
>
'It seems that the information provided may not fully align with the
actual circumstances. '
(:-)

There are times I feel sorry for Frank. He has to live with himself
knowing that he's a phony and a liar. It's likely one of the reasons
he has such poor self esteem and thus feels the need to brag and
berate everyone else. If he would just clean up his act, he'd start
feeling better about himself.

--
C'est bon
Soloman