Re: RE: Re: Most significant advance in bike technology for speed?

On 2/10/2025 2:30 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Tue Feb 4 17:54:59 2025 Catrike Ryder  wrote:

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:33:07 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

On 2/4/2025 2:23 PM, cyclintom wrote:

>
   have been puttoing in big miles for 50 years. While Brifters were certainly and improvement it had absolutely no comparison to 28 mm tires. Many of the early carbon fiber bikes were unrideable with high pressure 23 mm tires.

>
Really? Hadn't noticed.
>
I was out on my 1988 Kestrel fixie with 22mm tubulars this
morning. Aside from the cold, everything else was fine.

>
I was out on a 50 mile ride today, too. Temperatures were near 80 and
my neuropathy was almost nonexistant, so I left the cane in it's tube
for the entire ride. I didn't need to shoot anyone, either, so I left
the gun it's tube for the entire ride, too.

    If you haven't ridden your Kestrel with 28 mm tubeless how can you compare them?
 Catrike: You're insulting Krygowski, it is his claim that anyone that has a gun is authorized to kill people by the dozens.

Frame can't clear 28mm anything- tubeless, tubes nor tubulars.  And I didn't say it was superior I just wrote I had no complaints. Which I still do not.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971