Sujet : Re: Another criminal cyclist
De : news (at) *nospam* hartig-mantel.de (Rolf Mantel)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 12. Feb 2025, 10:54:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vohr3p$285c4$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 12.02.2025 um 10:32 schrieb Catrike Ryder:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:37:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
>
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
>
From today's paper:
>
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to-
deal- with-mass-shootings/
>
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
>
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun-
violence-united-states-outlier
>
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about
American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
>
The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislation
across a wide range of policy and culture.
>
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number of bad
incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the legislation was bad.
That there might be lower numbers of bad incidents does not prove it
was caused by legislation.
Sure, correlation is not causation. However, it is a storng indicator that the legislation was not detrimental to reducing the number of incidents because an "anti-causation" would break correlation.
Another criminal cyclist
Re: Another criminal cyclist