Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:54:01 +0100, Rolf Mantel
<news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
>Am 12.02.2025 um 10:32 schrieb Catrike Ryder:>On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:37:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski>
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislationOn 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:>>>
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
>
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to-
deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
>
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun-
violence-united-states-outlier
>
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about
American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
>
across a wide range of policy and culture.
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number of bad
incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the legislation was bad.
That there might be lower numbers of bad incidents does not prove it
was caused by legislation.
Sure, correlation is not causation. However, it is a storng indicator
that the legislation was not detrimental to reducing the number of
incidents because an "anti-causation" would break correlation.
It might have been something that happened in another country, like
perhaps they stopped allowing their thugs to come across the border.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.