Re: The US Postal Service

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: The US Postal Service
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 14. Feb 2025, 00:08:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <volu1v$32rug$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/13/2025 5:34 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/13/2025 3:06 PM, Mark J cleary wrote:
I believe at one time the US Postal Service sponsored cycling. Well they sure have been on my bad list as of late. Seems things are much slower than they ever were and shoddy.
>
I order a set of different guitar strings from a place in Traverse City Michigan. That is about 8 hour drive from here. Priority mailed out 02/05/25. I got the package today and yes the weather was bad they said it would be delay. It sat in at the post office in my town for 5 days. It showed up with a plastic bag around the mailing envelop and note of package damage. There was nothing in the package and only one set of the 4 string sets I ordered in the plastic bag sealing it all with apology.
>
The place is going to send out the remaining strings but I wonder if they file a claim with the post office. Frankly probably not worth the effort. To top that off it took 21 days in December for a letter of mine to get to Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
>
Maybe Trump will look  into that too they need something done. Frankly quite allowing junk mail and get the act together.
 Yes that's right:
http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/us-postal-tour-de-france- squads-1999-2006/
 USPS won a lawsuit against Mr Armstrong following his fall from grace:
https://natlawreview.com/article/lance-armstrong-pays-5-million-to- settle-100-million-us-government-law-suit
 Yes prices are up, way up, and no end of that in sight. There are a lot of reasons and a lot of players- plenty enough blame to go around. This is not solely on Mr DeJOy who has deep logistics experience but is stymied by the nature of a not private not public structure.  All that on top of freight being fuel+labor plus a markup. These are not good times for the Post Office.
 Yes, the vaunted "2 Day" service is now four to ten days and more than double rates ten years ago.
 But no, in fairness, loss/damage rates remain steady (I ship a LOT of packages) although always higher than FedEx or UPS.
   A loss/damage claim takes 30 to 90 days, and they do pay when they are at fault, but the process is tedious.
 Oh, and there is little a President can do. 
Seems like the presidents been doing an awfully lot of things a president is prohibited by law from doing - rescinding guaranteed constitutional rights by executive order, firing employees without due cause, appointing a political donor to shut down departments with no oversight, freezing congressionally approved funds...

It's on Congress to act, which they have not and will not.
 
If trump wants the USPS dissolved, it will be dissolved by the spineless republican majority.
Remember, it's now considered treason to disagree with this "president's" policies. Not just any president, just _this_ president.
fuck the working class.
--
Add xx to reply

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Feb 25 * The US Postal Service46Mark J cleary
13 Feb 25 +* Re: The US Postal Service29Roger Merriman
13 Feb 25 i+- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
13 Feb 25 i+* Re: The US Postal Service20AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii`* Re: The US Postal Service19Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii `* Re: The US Postal Service18John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  +* Re: The US Postal Service12Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service7Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii  ii+* Re: The US Postal Service5Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  iii`* Re: The US Postal Service4AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  iii `* Re: The US Postal Service3Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  iii  `* Re: The US Postal Service2AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  iii   `- Re: The US Postal Service1Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service3John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`* Re: The US Postal Service2Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  ii `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  +* Re: The US Postal Service4Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service2John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
14 Feb 25 ii  i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i`* Re: The US Postal Service7AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i +* Re: The US Postal Service2Roger Merriman
18 Feb 25 i i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i `* Re: The US Postal Service4Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The US Postal Service3AMuzi
19 Feb 25 i   +- Re: The US Postal Service1Catrike Ryder
20 Feb 25 i   `- Re: The US Postal Service1Shadow
13 Feb 25 +* Re: The US Postal Service15AMuzi
14 Feb 25 i+- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
16 Feb 25 i`* Re: The US Postal Service13AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i `* Re: The US Postal Service12Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i  +- Re: The US Postal Service1Roger Merriman
17 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The US Postal Service10AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   +* Re: The US Postal Service5Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: The US Postal Service4AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: The US Postal Service3Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i   i  +- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   i  `- Re: The US Postal Service1Roger Merriman
18 Feb 25 i   `* Re: The US Postal Service4John B.
18 Feb 25 i    `* Re: The US Postal Service3Shadow
18 Feb 25 i     `* Re: The US Postal Service2AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i      `- Re: The US Postal Service1Shadow
14 Feb 25 `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal