Sujet : Re: Cyclist dead
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 15. Feb 2025, 20:53:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <irq1rj9semrqah5ua2kj3na60qu6b43b0k@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 12:45:59 -0600, AMuzi <
am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/15/2025 12:11 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/15/2025 8:55 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/15/2025 5:18 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 23:17:42 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 2/14/2025 7:59 PM, Mark J cleary wrote:
On 2/14/2025 12:57 PM, AMuzi wrote:
https://realdealnews.org/2025/02/14/extreme-sports-
influencer-dies-
while-cycling-down-volcano/
Live for a thrill and you get to die for the thrill.
This does not make
sense to me at all.
>
Agreed. "Influencers" who do hyper-risky tricks to gain
followers and
make money do nobody any good. They probably inspire
other fools to lose
at risky tricks. And as in this case, they trigger
public spending to
rescue them from their failures.
>
For many people, risk is the spice of life. For others,
it's something
to be avoided.
>
--
C'est bon
Soloman
>
Yes and we all choose our battles.
>
One might say Mr Villareal Perez died doing what he loved,
which is not the worst way to go out.
If he retained consciousness about five minutes after his
crash, my bet is that he thought "OK, that was a huge
mistake" rather than "Oh good, I'm going to die from doing
what I loved."
Not all decisions are correct.
>
I would not have done that or anything of the sort but it
was his decision to make.
+1
He apparently, thought it was the correct decision for him to make.
It's the risk takers who run the world.
-- C'est bonSoloman