Re: Ove Interest?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Ove Interest?
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 17. Feb 2025, 13:01:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <8u86rjtd67dfp2vqop5tm2qvved9ifm42b@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:25:18 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:10:05 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:34:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:17:39 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 14:48:31 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 2/16/2025 5:48 AM, John B. wrote:
 
well the gun in the house thing is certainly, correct.... as long as
someone in the house wants to shoot you :-)
 
But  I suspect that many people live in houses where the other partner
doesn't want to shoot his, hers, its,  partner.
>
What you posted, John, is blindingly obvious. But it avoids the point
that I've made, and that data has confirmed.
>
<LOL> Nonsense... 
>
A very large proportion of people with guns in the home say they have
the gun for "protection." That is, they believe they are less likely to
be subject to serious violence if they have a gun readily available.
>
The data is clear that their assumption is false. The people with guns
in the house are _more_ likely to suffer serious violence, and that's
true no matter where they live. The serious violence normally does not
come from outsiders. It comes from someone in their own house.
>
Beyond that, the gun isn't very likely to be useful against outside
aggressors, as your own personal story indicated.
>
I know you love guns, but what I've posted are the facts. You should be
able to love guns while understanding that their value is highly overrated.
>
"The data is clear that their assumption is false. The people with
guns in the house are _more_ likely to suffer serious violence, and
that's true no matter where they live."
>
Nonsense, there's no data that even hints at such a thing. The idea
that the reason someone might be "more likely to suffer serious
violence" because they have a gun in their home is ridiculous beyond
rational thought.
>
>
I suspect that if you were to study all cases of someone murdering
another person in the same household you will find many cases where a
gun was used. However that doesn't mean that it is the gun that is at
fault. As I've mentioned my own family had guns in the house for at
least three and counting my kids four generations with no problems and
growing up in rural New England guns were not uncommon, as I've said,
every farm family, for sure, had at one. How else to keep the fox out
of the chicken house.
>
I could go even further. In early colonial times, before any thought
of a nation some colonies had a law that every adult male MUST have a
weapon and bring them to church on Sunday so that a check could be
made that he actually had a weapon and ammunition. Strange, isn't it
that with a gun in every house in settlement there are no records of
massive gun deaths.
>
In short, the statement that a gun in the house is dangerious is just
what the "Anti Gunners" want to hear and so they repeat it over and
over and over.
>
The old saying that "guns don't shoot people, people shoot people"
really is true.
>
Krygowski insists that correlation implies causation, a common
fallacious argument used by people who don't know any better.
>
I suspect that people who don't vote are more likely to suffer
violence than people who do vote. If that were true, according to
Krygowski's twisted "logic," not voting is dangerous.
>
I came across something today that references the danger of guns in
the house that Frankie would have us be live is a major danger.
that
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2848468/
"During 2006 and 2007, again, approximately 70 percent of gun-shot
deaths were suicides."
>
So now Frankie is preventing suicides. He already justified killing
children in autos and now if he can just do away with the black pickup
trucks ...... (and that guy next door with the machine gun...)

OMG, OMG, OMG! Do you mean that if we take away people's guns nobody
will be able to commit suicide, and nobody will be able to kill their
domestic partners?
 

--
C'est bon
Soloman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Feb 25 * Ove Interest?332John B.
13 Feb 25 +* Re: Ove Interest?2Catrike Ryder
13 Feb 25 i`- Re: Ove Interest?1John B.
13 Feb 25 `* Re: Ove Interest?329AMuzi
14 Feb 25  `* Re: Ove Interest?328Frank Krygowski
14 Feb 25   +* Re: Ove Interest?245AMuzi
15 Feb 25   i`* Re: Ove Interest?244Frank Krygowski
15 Feb 25   i +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
15 Feb 25   i +* Re: Ove Interest?236AMuzi
15 Feb 25   i i`* Re: Ove Interest?235Roger Merriman
15 Feb 25   i i +* Re: Ove Interest?233Frank Krygowski
15 Feb 25   i i i`* Re: Ove Interest?232AMuzi
15 Feb 25   i i i `* Re: Ove Interest?231Frank Krygowski
16 Feb 25   i i i  +* Re: Ove Interest?228Catrike Ryder
16 Feb 25   i i i  i`* Re: Ove Interest?227John B.
16 Feb 25   i i i  i `* Re: Ove Interest?226Frank Krygowski
16 Feb 25   i i i  i  +* Re: Ove Interest?221Catrike Ryder
16 Feb 25   i i i  i  i`* Re: Ove Interest?220John B.
16 Feb 25   i i i  i  i `* Re: Ove Interest?219Frank Krygowski
16 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  +* Re: Ove Interest?173Catrike Ryder
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i`* Re: Ove Interest?172John B.
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i +- Re: Ove Interest?1AMuzi
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i +* Re: Ove Interest?109Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i+* Re: Ove Interest?68John B.
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii`* Re: Ove Interest?67Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii +* Re: Ove Interest?62AMuzi
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii i+- Re: Ove Interest?1Roger Merriman
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii i+* Re: Ove Interest?59Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii`* Re: Ove Interest?58Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii +* Re: Ove Interest?53Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i`* Re: Ove Interest?52Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i `* Re: Ove Interest?50Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i  +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i  `* Re: Ove Interest?48Zen Cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i   `* Re: Ove Interest?47Frank Krygowski
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    +* Re: Ove Interest?44Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i+- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i`* Re: Ove Interest?42AMuzi
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i +* Re: Ove Interest?6Zen Cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i i`* Re: Ove Interest?5Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i i `* Re: Ove Interest?4AMuzi
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i i  +- Re: Ove Interest?1Zen Cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i i  `* Re: Ove Interest?2Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i i   `- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i +- Re: Ove Interest?1Zen Cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i +* Re: Ove Interest?2Frank Krygowski
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i i`- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i `* Re: Ove Interest?31Roger Merriman
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  +* Re: Ove Interest?29Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i`* Re: Ove Interest?28Roger Merriman
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i +- Re: Ove Interest?1Zen Cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i `* Re: Ove Interest?26Catrike Ryder
20 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i  `* Re: Ove Interest?25John B.
20 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   +- Re: Ove Interest?1AMuzi
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   +* Re: Ove Interest?22zen cycle
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i`* Re: Ove Interest?21John B.
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i `* Re: Ove Interest?20Frank Krygowski
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i  `* Re: Ove Interest?19AMuzi
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   +* Re: Ove Interest?7Rolf Mantel
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   i+* Re: Ove Interest?5John B.
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii+* Re: Ove Interest?3AMuzi
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   iii`* Re: Ove Interest?2Frank Krygowski
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   iii `- Re: Ove Interest?1AMuzi
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii`- Re: Ove Interest?1Rolf Mantel
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   i`- Re: Ove Interest?1Roger Merriman
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   +* Re: Ove Interest?10John B.
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   i+* Re: Ove Interest?7Zen Cycle
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii`* Re: Ove Interest?6Frank Krygowski
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii `* Re: Ove Interest?5AMuzi
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii  +- Re: Ove Interest?1Frank Krygowski
25 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii  `* Re: Ove Interest?3John B.
25 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii   `* Re: Ove Interest?2AMuzi
25 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   ii    `- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   i`* Re: Ove Interest?2Roger Merriman
25 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   i `- Re: Ove Interest?1John B.
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   i   `- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
24 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  i   `- Re: Ove Interest?1zen cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    i  `- Re: Ove Interest?1AMuzi
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i    `* Re: Ove Interest?2Zen Cycle
19 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii i     `- Re: Ove Interest?1Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii `* Re: Ove Interest?4John B.
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii  +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii  `* Re: Ove Interest?2Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii ii   `- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii i`- Re: Ove Interest?1John B.
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii `* Re: Ove Interest?3John B.
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii  `* Re: Ove Interest?2Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i ii   `- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i+- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i`* Re: Ove Interest?39AMuzi
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i +* Re: Ove Interest?35Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i i+- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i i+* Re: Ove Interest?23John B.
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i ii+* Re: Ove Interest?4zen cycle
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i iii+* Re: Ove Interest?2John B.
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i iiii`- Re: Ove Interest?1Zen Cycle
3 Mar 25   i i i  i  i  i i iii`- Re: Ove Interest?1Zen Cycle
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i ii+- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i ii`* Re: Ove Interest?17Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i i+* Re: Ove Interest?8Frank Krygowski
3 Mar 25   i i i  i  i  i i i`* Re: Ove Interest?2Frank Krygowski
18 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i i `* Re: Ove Interest?3John B.
17 Feb 25   i i i  i  i  i `* Re: Ove Interest?61Catrike Ryder
3 Mar 25   i i i  i  i  +- Re: Ove Interest?1Catrike Ryder
4 Mar 25   i i i  i  i  `* Re: Ove Interest?44John B.
16 Feb 25   i i i  i  +- Re: Ove Interest?1Roger Merriman
16 Feb 25   i i i  i  `* Re: Ove Interest?3AMuzi
16 Feb 25   i i i  `* Re: Ove Interest?2AMuzi
19 Feb 25   i i `- Re: Ove Interest?1John B.
18 Feb 25   i `* Re: Ove Interest?6AMuzi
14 Feb 25   `* Re: Ove Interest?82Catrike Ryder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal