Re: The US Postal Service

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: The US Postal Service
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 18. Feb 2025, 01:22:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmj7rj5rctga2g1u2jt66616t63rtgbmrg@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:37:19 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 2/16/2025 9:37 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/16/2025 4:58 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/16/2025 3:50 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu Feb 13 16:34:16 2025 AMuzi  wrote:
On 2/13/2025 3:06 PM, Mark J cleary wrote:
I believe at one time the US Postal Service sponsored
cycling. Well they sure have been on my bad list as of
late.
Seems things are much slower than they ever were and
shoddy.
>
I order a set of different guitar strings from a place in
Traverse City Michigan. That is about 8 hour drive from
here. Priority mailed out 02/05/25. I got the package
today
and yes the weather was bad they said it would be
delay. It
sat in at the post office in my town for 5 days. It showed
up with a plastic bag around the mailing envelop and
note of
package damage. There was nothing in the package and only
one set of the 4 string sets I ordered in the plastic bag
sealing it all with apology.
>
The place is going to send out the remaining strings but I
wonder if they file a claim with the post office. Frankly
probably not worth the effort. To top that off it took 21
days in December for a letter of mine to get to
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania.
>
Maybe Trump will look into that too they need something
done. Frankly quite allowing junk mail and get the act
together.
>
Yes that's right:
http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/us-postal-tour-de-
france- squads-1999-2006/
>
USPS won a lawsuit against Mr Armstrong following his fall
from grace:
https://natlawreview.com/article/lance-armstrong-pays-5-
million-to- settle-100-million-us-government-law-suit
>
Yes prices are up, way up, and no end of that in sight.
There are a lot of reasons and a lot of players- plenty
enough blame to go around. This is not solely on Mr DeJOy
who has deep logistics experience but is stymied by the
nature of a not private not public structure.  All that on
top of freight being fuel+labor plus a markup. These are
not
good times for the Post Office.
>
Yes, the vaunted "2 Day" service is now four to ten days
and
more than double rates ten years ago.
>
But no, in fairness, loss/damage rates remain steady (I
ship
a LOT of packages) although always higher than FedEx or
UPS.
>
   A loss/damage claim takes 30 to 90 days, and they do pay
when they are at fault, but the process is tedious.
>
Oh, and there is little a President can do.  It's on
Congress to act, which they have not and will not.
>
>
>
>
Like Mark, the cost isn't nearly as bad as the piss poor
service. I ordered a parts kit to put the hydraulics
together on the 9th. The last it was heard from was the
10th. They claim that I will receive it on the 20th but
the tracking doesn't show that USPS ever got it. This
stuff fits in a 6 x 6 envelope!
>
Shipments from Texas or Colorado take 8 days and EVEN
from Las Vegas (how the hell did it get there? I ordered
from Sparks near Reno.) is so far running at 10 days when
I could drive round trip in one day.
>
You ask why? Because Regional Sort Centers.
>
Anything I ship USPS (to you, for example) goes to Oak
Creek Center near Milwaukee first. Yes that's the wrong
direction.
 
Agreed. Mail going from my suburban village to another
suburb of the adjacent city gets shipped up to Cleveland,
then back down.
 
It used to be sorted in the main post office at the city
center, and be delivered days faster. But they spent big
money to remove all the sorting machines down there. Why?
Got me. Ask Mr. DeJoy.
 
 
>
The newer optical scan/sort machines are huge, efficient and
extremely fast. They're also expensive so it makes more
sense to run those at capacity in a few places than hand
sort everywhere. See also FedEx hub:
>
https://www.cnet.com/science/at-fedex-sorting-packages-1-5-million-at-a-time/

As I said, my father worked in the Post Office all his working life so
I heard all the bitches when I was a kid. Some sort of centralized
sorting was used even way back then, whether by machine or machine. A
local sporting clothing company sold, and advertised, all over the
U.S. and their advertisement going to addressees other then  local was
bundled and sent somewhere else for further sorting.

It wouldn't make much sense for mail addressed to 9 East Overshoe
Avenue, Nowhereville, Cal, to be sorted in a little town in N.H. Just
bundle it up and send it all to California or some other central
point.

--
Cheers,

John B.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Feb 25 * The US Postal Service46Mark J cleary
13 Feb 25 +* Re: The US Postal Service29Roger Merriman
13 Feb 25 i+- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
13 Feb 25 i+* Re: The US Postal Service20AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii`* Re: The US Postal Service19Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii `* Re: The US Postal Service18John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  +* Re: The US Postal Service12Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service7Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii  ii+* Re: The US Postal Service5Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  iii`* Re: The US Postal Service4AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  iii `* Re: The US Postal Service3Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  iii  `* Re: The US Postal Service2AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  iii   `- Re: The US Postal Service1Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service3John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`* Re: The US Postal Service2Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  ii `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  +* Re: The US Postal Service4Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service2John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
14 Feb 25 ii  i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i`* Re: The US Postal Service7AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i +* Re: The US Postal Service2Roger Merriman
18 Feb 25 i i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i `* Re: The US Postal Service4Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The US Postal Service3AMuzi
19 Feb 25 i   +- Re: The US Postal Service1Catrike Ryder
20 Feb 25 i   `- Re: The US Postal Service1Shadow
13 Feb 25 +* Re: The US Postal Service15AMuzi
14 Feb 25 i+- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
16 Feb 25 i`* Re: The US Postal Service13AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i `* Re: The US Postal Service12Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i  +- Re: The US Postal Service1Roger Merriman
17 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The US Postal Service10AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   +* Re: The US Postal Service5Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: The US Postal Service4AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: The US Postal Service3Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i   i  +- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   i  `- Re: The US Postal Service1Roger Merriman
18 Feb 25 i   `* Re: The US Postal Service4John B.
18 Feb 25 i    `* Re: The US Postal Service3Shadow
18 Feb 25 i     `* Re: The US Postal Service2AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i      `- Re: The US Postal Service1Shadow
14 Feb 25 `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal