Re: The US Postal Service

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: The US Postal Service
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 18. Feb 2025, 19:40:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <nji9rjh1642qj4sk70f0c903crj26bofru@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:25:47 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 2/18/2025 10:10 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu Feb 13 21:43:55 2025 Roger Merriman  wrote:
>
If it?s not funded by government ie has to fund its self, then services
will always come 2nd to profitability, ie if one wants no or low junk mail,
and for it to be run as service then will need some government funding. EX
postie in UK which has been privatised and now a commercial company with
totally expected results ie worsening service.
>
Can?t see Trump wanting to fund it somehow!
 
 
 
 
Roger, I know that you look through the lens of socialism being taught that in school but EVERYTHING is moving by mail. If Amazon Prime can give you cut rate prices and deliver the next day, the US Postal System can make a profit on 10,000 times the movement of mail.
 
 
>
Not 'can'; 'could'. But they do not.
>
Logistics contract negotiators at Amazon are really first
rate and richly informed.  It took UPS years of losses to
cancel their largest customer but they really had to do that
to stem the losses on Amazon delivery.
>
USPS employees are quite vocal about their current Amazon
arrangements and mystified that the rate/volume continue.
>
It's really true that one cannot sell at a loss and 'make it
up in volume'. Not in logistics, not in bicycles, not in
banking...

I just bought some new stainless mixing bowls. They reportedly shipped
(UPS) yesterday (2/17/25) late afternoon from a restaurant supply
store in Connecticut and is scheduled to arrive 2/20/25. Assuming that
happens, I'm quite satisfied with that.

--
C'est bon
Soloman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Feb 25 * The US Postal Service46Mark J cleary
13 Feb 25 +* Re: The US Postal Service29Roger Merriman
13 Feb 25 i+- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
13 Feb 25 i+* Re: The US Postal Service20AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii`* Re: The US Postal Service19Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii `* Re: The US Postal Service18John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  +* Re: The US Postal Service12Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service7Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii  ii+* Re: The US Postal Service5Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  iii`* Re: The US Postal Service4AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  iii `* Re: The US Postal Service3Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  iii  `* Re: The US Postal Service2AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  iii   `- Re: The US Postal Service1Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service3John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`* Re: The US Postal Service2Catrike Ryder
14 Feb 25 ii  ii `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  +* Re: The US Postal Service4Roger Merriman
14 Feb 25 ii  i+* Re: The US Postal Service2John B.
14 Feb 25 ii  ii`- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
14 Feb 25 ii  i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
14 Feb 25 ii  `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i`* Re: The US Postal Service7AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i +* Re: The US Postal Service2Roger Merriman
18 Feb 25 i i`- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i `* Re: The US Postal Service4Catrike Ryder
19 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The US Postal Service3AMuzi
19 Feb 25 i   +- Re: The US Postal Service1Catrike Ryder
20 Feb 25 i   `- Re: The US Postal Service1Shadow
13 Feb 25 +* Re: The US Postal Service15AMuzi
14 Feb 25 i+- Re: The US Postal Service1Zen Cycle
16 Feb 25 i`* Re: The US Postal Service13AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i `* Re: The US Postal Service12Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i  +- Re: The US Postal Service1Roger Merriman
17 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The US Postal Service10AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   +* Re: The US Postal Service5Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: The US Postal Service4AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: The US Postal Service3Frank Krygowski
17 Feb 25 i   i  +- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi
17 Feb 25 i   i  `- Re: The US Postal Service1Roger Merriman
18 Feb 25 i   `* Re: The US Postal Service4John B.
18 Feb 25 i    `* Re: The US Postal Service3Shadow
18 Feb 25 i     `* Re: The US Postal Service2AMuzi
18 Feb 25 i      `- Re: The US Postal Service1Shadow
14 Feb 25 `- Re: The US Postal Service1AMuzi

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal