Re: Ove Interest?

On 2/19/2025 3:05 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:51:48 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 2/18/2025 12:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:

<snicker> dumbass thinks ignoring the result of the correlation means he
can deny a correlation.
>

>

>
Dumbass need to be re-educated on the meaning of "correlation"
>

...

>
This is from a dumbass who was presented with two government reports
detailing the specification, testing, acceptance, and subsequent
acquisition of 80,000 AR-15s by the US military and concludes 'the AR-15
is a weapon the US military never wanted and never used'.
>

>
Uneducable.
>

>
indeed.

>
He trots out his favorite platitude every time he's presented with
evidence that he doesn't like.
>
I suspect the only "causation" he'll accept is a correlation that was
fed to him from some whacko right wing talk show.
>
I'm generally resisting the urge to respond to him. I suspect that's
giving his life even less meaning, but I'm not sympathetic.

>
Failure to respond indicates that he has no answer, although there's
the remote possibility that he understand that I'm right, he's wrong
and simply doesn't have balls to admit it.

lol...as if that isn't 'affirming the consequent'.

>
Affirming the consequent is a formal fallacy that is committed when it
is stated that because the consequent is true, therefore the
antecedent is true as Krygowski did in the following statement:
>
"Providing proper fertilization to a growing plant correlates with
faster growth. That correlation correctly implies causation."
--Krygowski
>
Affirming the consequent is claiming that if P implies Q, therefore Q
implies P.

nope, sorry dumbass. This is just a lame attempt at a defense on your part because you're still butthurt from being corrected when you insisted "correlation is not causation".

>
Affirming the consequent is claiming that if fertilization makes a
plant grow faster, therefore plants grow faster when fertilized.
That is clearly false.

Sure dumbass....Plants do _not_ grow faster when fertilized. Maybe that'll work with the anti-science trump/musk sycophants being put in charge of the USDA, but for those of us that actually respect and understand science it's just another willfully ignorant magatard trying to sound as if he has a fucking clue. HINT: you don't.
We're being told prayer works just as well. Tel ya what, dumbass, You take two of the same species and variety of plants in identical conditions, except that you give one fertilizer and pray over the other. Let us know how well that works out....

>
Krygowski and Junior might have learned that if they were better
educated

seeing you criticize others for lack of education is almost as funny as seeing tommy do it.

>
But then again, understanding the intricacies of logic requires a
level of intellect that neither of them possess.

says the willfully ignorant magatard who wrote "if fertilization makes a
plant grow faster, therefore plants grow faster when fertilized. That is clearly false."
lol..The dumbass still making the dumbshine state proud.
--
Add xx to reply