Re: RE: Re: Kennedy Papers

On 2/19/2025 12:36 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Wed Feb 19 04:02:42 2025 Catrike Ryder  wrote:

>
I'm not execting anything earthshattering. Such secrets as that tend
to find their way to the surface.

    The papers are quit explicit. JFK relalized that the CIA had lied to him about Vietnam - there WAS no movement for a free enterprise system there. Most of Vietnam didn't care what government they had and Communism sounded better to them as it does to Shadow. The CIA was doing nothing more than they did all over the world in the last 70 years: start wars to profit the weapons industry. Kennedy was going to pull the US military including the military advisors out of Vietnam.
 The CIA first enlisted Cuban Castroites too kill Kennedy since they were more than pissed off from the failed Bay of Pigs invasion effort. The CIA simply told them that it was Kennedy's idea.
 Since only 45% of the public believed the Warren Commision I wouldn't sau that the newly released papers would be earthshattering.
 But RFK Jr. has said MANY times that Sirhan Sirhan did NOT kill his father - that like all fools with a gun he missed with every shot and his father was killed (Remember, at the time RFK was attorney General who could open a case about his brother's assassination.) by being shot in the back at close range. It is EASY to tell the exact range since anything closer than 10 feet leaves unmistakeable traces. In RFK's case the gun was pressed into his back. The details are too ugly to describe,
 It also appears that the CIA was involved in the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King. Why that SOB was preaching PEACE. The CIA couldn't have that. Even when I was in Guam, the CIA was running drugs out of Laos using military aircraft that they would park far away from our bombers. Ground crews would tell us what was going on.

Yes, most people agree that Sirhan, wrestled by aides in front of Mr Kennedy, could not have shot RFK in the back of his head.
Yes, most people are suspect regarding Mr Oswald as a 'lone assassin'.
But on the cusp of actually reading original documents IMHO this is a time for patience not further hypotheses.
YMMV as always.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971