Re: The US Postal Service

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:44:55 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 2/18/2025 12:40 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:25:47 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
 

On 2/18/2025 10:10 AM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Feb 13 21:43:55 2025 Roger Merriman  wrote:

>
If it?s not funded by government ie has to fund its self, then services
will always come 2nd to profitability, ie if one wants no or low junk mail,
and for it to be run as service then will need some government funding. EX
postie in UK which has been privatised and now a commercial company with
totally expected results ie worsening service.
>
Can?t see Trump wanting to fund it somehow!

>
>
>
>
Roger, I know that you look through the lens of socialism being taught that in school but EVERYTHING is moving by mail. If Amazon Prime can give you cut rate prices and deliver the next day, the US Postal System can make a profit on 10,000 times the movement of mail.
>
>

>
Not 'can'; 'could'. But they do not.
>
Logistics contract negotiators at Amazon are really first
rate and richly informed.  It took UPS years of losses to
cancel their largest customer but they really had to do that
to stem the losses on Amazon delivery.
>
USPS employees are quite vocal about their current Amazon
arrangements and mystified that the rate/volume continue.
>
It's really true that one cannot sell at a loss and 'make it
up in volume'. Not in logistics, not in bicycles, not in
banking...

 
I just bought some new stainless mixing bowls. They reportedly shipped
(UPS) yesterday (2/17/25) late afternoon from a restaurant supply
store in Connecticut and is scheduled to arrive 2/20/25. Assuming that
happens, I'm quite satisfied with that.
 
--
C'est bon
Soloman

>
Today's USPS update:
>
https://apnews.com/article/united-states-postal-service-usps-postmaster-dejoy-steps-down-9692807bf87a0283385d30c1b46e22c4

Reminds me that I'm due to go out and empty my mailbox.

--
C'est bon
Soloman