Re: The Law is a ass

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: The Law is a ass
De : slocombjb (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John B.)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 20. Feb 2025, 12:12:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ed3erjd80ijgs6jdve1pajg7u630pu28gv@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
On 20 Feb 2025 09:19:01 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:

AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
Not only in Dickens.  In Illinois case law too:
 
 
https://chi.streetsblog.org/2025/02/18/a-new-illinois-bill-would-assert-that-people-on-bikes-are-intended-user-of-every-roadway-in-the-state-where-its-legal-to-ride
 
With any luck, soon to be rectified.
>
I’d assume knowing a touch about US Motordom that this was intended rather
than unexpected outcome, after all the aim was to have a car dependent
society!
>
Roger Merriman

The wording says "bicycles are to be considered "intended users" of
any roadway where riding is allowed, thereby allowing them to seek
damages."

--
Cheers,

John B.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Feb 25 * The Law is a ass7AMuzi
20 Feb 25 +* Re: The Law is a ass5Roger Merriman
20 Feb 25 i`* Re: The Law is a ass4John B.
20 Feb 25 i `* Re: The Law is a ass3Roger Merriman
20 Feb 25 i  `* Re: The Law is a ass2John B.
20 Feb 25 i   `- Re: The Law is a ass1Rolf Mantel
20 Feb 25 `- Re: The Law is a ass1Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal