Re: [OT] How to live like a Doge

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:59:51 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:52:47 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

On Thu Feb 20 17:31:29 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:

 
You'll find some pointers to details in the footnotes listed at the
end of the Fesivus Report 2024.
 
The report was not intended to be a detailed indictment of those
involved.  Such reports are written as an indication that something is
wrong and is worth investigating.  If someone accepts the task, they
will provide whatever facts they can find.  Eventually, we'll have a
formal investigation, probably by a congressional committee. 
 
There should be something on all the items on internet.  Starting from
the top:
"Ghost Towns on the Government's Dime: The federal government spent
$10 billion on maintaining, leasing, and furnishing almost entirely
empty buildings"
 
Under the first photos is "Source GAO-23-106200" which leads me to:
 
There are 3 footnotes for highlighted text at (i), (ii) and (iii)
which can be found among the footnotes at the end.  As an example,
I'll follow the beaten path in the first footnote:
 
(i) Marroni, David. "FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY Preliminary Results Show
Federal Buildings Remain Underutilized Due to Longstanding Challenges
and Increased Telework." Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public
Buildings, and Emergency Management, Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, House of Representatives, July 2023.
 
That points to an official GAO (government accountability office)
report:
 
Federal Real Property: Preliminary Results Show Federal Buildings
Remain Underutilized Due to Longstanding Challenges and Increased
Telework  GAO-23-106200 Published: Jul 13, 2023. Publicly Released:
Jul 13, 2023.
<https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106200>
which seems quite real to me has considerable detail.
 
Is that sufficient?  All you need to do now is repeat the same process
for every item in the Festivus Report.  Eventually, you'll have the
start of an investigation.

>
>
>
>
Wow! That is so intelligent, I just don't hardly knowb what to say but to ask you who voted for Jill Biden, Christopher Wray, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, etc. Where on my election form were these people so that I could pick and choose?
>
On a good day you can't find one original thing to say so you repeat the word of idiots.
>
Is your dementia getting that bad?

>
Wow, so stupid.  All that rubbish about voting for government
officials has nothing to do with identifying government spending your
tax dollars in an inappropriate manner.  Electing someone to an office
does not guarantee that they will be honest.  Try to stay on topic
please.

I'm more inclined to believe that electing someone to an office almost
guarantees that they will not be honest.

--
C'est bon
Soloman