Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 2/28/2025 3:56 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:I (naively?) assumed you meant 'by negligence or malice' and I was happy to agree with that.On 2/28/2025 3:18 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:First, let's acknowledge that rule will never be implemented in the U.S. But if it were, driver caution would increase many times over.>even if it's a legit accident?
In my view, a person who kills someone with their car should never, ever be allowed to drive again.
>
>
Say for example some dumbshit simply walks in front your car while you're driving along doing say, 40 mph in a 45 mph zone.
After the first few "dumbshit walks in front of car" episodes actually resulted in "no more driving" and were publicized, motorists might begin slowing to non-fatal speeds when pedestrians (or bicyclists) are within walk-in- front range.
As I've said here before, if an overhead crane operator killed someone in a factory, I think they'd never be allowed to operate the crane again, no matter what their excuse.
Humans have given up far more than we should have to motordom. Streets and roads were once the domain of pedestrians, of kids playing, of people interacting. Turning them entirely over to motorists was a deliberate campaign goal of the car manufacturers.
https://marker.medium.com/the-invention-of-jaywalking- afd48f994c05
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.