Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 3/6/2025 5:11 AM, zen cycle wrote:um....It was a joke about metric vs imperial torx, AndrewOn 3/5/2025 5:06 PM, AMuzi wrote:Imperial are a distinct rarity here in USA ( I went all over hell to find a WW allen for my custom Hetchins long ago).On 3/5/2025 3:08 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:>The chain ring guard came so I set about mounting the chain rings and>
the guard. I ordered new chain ring bolts because I didn't want to
disassemble the old crank. The new inner bolts had hex deep down
inside and I figure that was fine until I could not find a allen
wrench that fit them. I tried both metric and standard and nothing
fits. The bolts on my old crank take a #5 allen.
>
Does anyone know what's going on?
>
I ordered another set of 16mm bolts and they look like they have a
larger hex that's not set deep inside it.
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman
News to me; 5-arm 110mm chainring bolts are a universal commodity AFAIK.
>
With a magnifier, see if they are just broached poorly or maybe if they are Torx. If you succumbed to the bad idea of an aluminum chainring bolt that's very possible.
I have a set that are torx, and it's a known "problem"
>
https://www.reddit.com/r/cycling/comments/6drndl/ shimano_chainring_bolts_t30_torx_why/?rdt=44490
>
If the bolts have crud built up and the light isn't really good, they can look like Allen,
>
Just make sure whether they're Imperial or Metric :)
More common are SAE, which outnumber, in fasteners and tools, metric to some great degree.
That said, chainring bolts are a minuscule subset of fasteners and, as a standard consumer product, not-metric are virtually unknown (or at least I have never seen one. Not one.)
It did actually turn out to be defective broaching which makes more sense than any other variant.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.