Re: bike path news

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:32:04 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 04:19:11 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

On 3/11/2025 8:45 PM, John B. wrote:

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:20:18 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 3/11/2025 8:57 AM, AMuzi wrote:

On 3/10/2025 10:09 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 3/10/2025 9:37 PM, John B. wrote:

>
Well... you exhibit a fear of firearms ...

>
Bullshit. I exhibit distaste for the American fetish for firearms, and
the effect it has on society. And I exhibit scorn for paranoia so
severe as to cause a person to _require_ a firearm to do ordinary
things like ride a quiet bike path, drive a car, fill a gas tank, etc.
>
I'm sympathetic to those controlled by some phobias. Not this one.
>
And BTW, it's not just our super-timid tricyclist. One classmate of
mine in an adult education class brought his handgun to a class picnic
in the country. Nice guy, but that was crazy paranoia. Another guy,
less admirable in general, bragged to me about carrying his handgun
into a folk music concert we attended. Absolute stupidity, and crazy
paranoia.
>
That latter guy played guitar, but was so obese that he used a special
stand to hold his guitar out away from his belly. Maybe his physical
shortcomings triggered feelings of great vulnerability, as with Mr.
Tricycle? Nonetheless, his risk assessment was off the charts crazy -
as is Mr. Tricycle's.
>

>
Replace 'firearm' in the above with 'bicycle helmet'.
Same argument.
>
And regarding risk assessment, I'm reasonable certain that this
shopping  mall in Greenwood Indiana never experienced a deranged madman
shooting into a crown before, and most probably never will again.
>
However, on one fine July day, it happened.
>
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2022/07/hero-armed-citizen-landed-8-
of-10-shots-at-40-yards-to-stop-mass-shooting-in-15-seconds/
>
Not especially that Mr Dicken was lawfully carrying only days after the
Indiana statute had changed to allow carry.
>
p.s. 8 of ten at 40 feet instantaneously without preparation is
excellent marksmanship. Not achievable without some diligence and range
time.
>

>
Which doesn't bode well for people who carry for personal protection and
never take the time and diligence. If there was a law requiring range
time and accuracy to carry a gun, I'd be a lot more confident in the
general public carrying guns. Instead, cases like this are far more
prevalent:
>
https://people.com/calif-toddler-accidentally-shoots-and-kills-mother-with-unsecured-gun-police-8759431

 
Ah But, as your reference states the boyfriend committed an illegal
act, and was charged, The Florida guy is talking about a legal act.
 
A bit of a difference, wouldn't one think?

>
not much. The gun fetishists (lobby) thinks any restrictions on gun
ownership are unconstitutional. In their (small) minds, the boyfriend
did nothing wrong.

>
>
Re restrictions on gun ownership???
>
The first piece of national gun control legislation was passed on June
26, 1934. The National Firearms Act (NFA)

Anti-gun loons believe most everything they're told by the
left-leaning media. Most gun enthusiasts favor responsible gun
management. My guns were always put away safe and secure when I had
kids. A pox on anyone who doesn't do likewise.

--
C'est bon
Soloman