Sujet : Re: Dead Vermont cyclist
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 14. Mar 2025, 21:45:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <t159tjtd7bc91j05rvp0bbhf93bc4fq8lq@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:02:31 -0500, AMuzi <
am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 3/14/2025 2:30 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 3/14/2025 1:25 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:44:15 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
Nope, I'm not sympathetic. What rule could be more
fundamental than
"Don't hit someone walking (or bicycling) with your car"?
>
And if killing someone with your car isn't sufficient
for forbidding
future driving, what would be?
>
Is the permission to drive really more important than a
person's life?
>
Isn't there a law against riding your bicycle in the path
of a moving
car?
no, dumbass.
>
The actual situation on the ground can be wildly different
depending on the statute, local road design, marking,
signage and practice, the personalities involved and
whatever the judge ate for lunch.
>
http://flbikelaw.org/2010/03/two-citations-identical-circumstances-opposite-verdicts/
I'm pretty sure that if I ride the Catrike out onto the road in front
of a moving truck, my estate would be liable for his broken headlight.
-- C'est bonSoloman
Dead Vermont cyclist
Re: Dead Vermont cyclist