Re: Dead Vermont cyclist

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Dead Vermont cyclist
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 15. Mar 2025, 19:56:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vr4ihd$e4h$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/15/2025 2:38 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:02:49 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
 
On 3/15/2025 9:02 AM, Roger Merriman wrote:
Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On 15 Mar 2025 10:03:53 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>
Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 22:47:32 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 3/14/2025 4:37 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:10:40 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
On 3/14/2025 1:25 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:44:15 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
Nope, I'm not sympathetic. What rule could be more fundamental than
"Don't hit someone walking (or bicycling) with your car"?
>
And if killing someone with your car isn't sufficient for forbidding
future driving, what would be?
>
Is the permission to drive really more important than a person's life?
>
Isn't there a law against riding your bicycle in the path of a moving
car?
>
What nonsense!
>
Oh well, go ahead and do it....
>
I do it all the time. I did it many times on today's ride, as usual. I'm
not nearly as fearful or as ignorant of the law as you are.
>
Man up, if you can.
>
I'm pretty sure that if I ride into the path of fast moving vehicles
and get hit, it'd be my own fault.
>
--
C'est bon
Soloman
>
>
There is world of difference between riding on a road, as one should be
able to so, and other users of the road as every have to adjust to others
using the road, back in wales I can encounter all manner of vehicles and
animals!
>
Even in london and areas around get
pedestrians/scooters/bikes/horses/motorbikes/milk
floats/vans/buses/lorries.
>
All of which will use the roads in different ways, unless it?s a motorway
where all traffic is broadly traveling same speeds.
>
Roger Merriman
>
Of course I'm not arguing against riding on streets and roads. I do it
regularly. Buit just like in a vehicle, moving into the path of a
faster moving vehicle might not be a good idea.
>
   At 30 mph you need roughly 120 feet to come to a complete stop (65
feet to react and 55 feet to brake) in good conditions.
   At 60 mph you need roughly 360 feet to come to a complete stop (130
feet to react and 190 feet to brake) in good conditions.
>
https://zutobi.com/us/driver-guides/reaction-braking-stopping-distance
>
--
C'est bon
Soloman
>
>
Don’t think Frank would have issue with that, only pushback I guess being
folks speeding or not driving to the conditions, but in general do need to
take into account oncoming traffic and that you have a gap to pull
into/cross safely.
Let's please recall that Mr. Tricycle Rider's original statement was
"Isn't there a law against riding your bicycle in the path of a moving
car?"
>
Note he did NOT say "pull out suddenly into the path of a moving car."
He may now be pretending he said that, or he may have been thinking that
while unable to express himself correctly. But his original statement
applied to any bicyclist riding in a normal position on a normal road
with a moving car somewhere behind him.
 No, "in the path" quite clearly means where the vehicle is going to
be.
:-)  Yes, of course. And when I'm riding a highway or country road, I am where the vehicle is going to be.
Sheesh!

And Mr. Tricycle may indeed +be terrified of that! He did say, long ago,
that "Nothing can make [it] safe..." Which is why he rides almost
entirely back and forth on a flat Florida bike path. (Boring!)
>
I think everyone else here rides on normal roads almost all the time,
with no great fears.
 Indeed, "Nothing can make bicycling among truck and car traffic safe.
I very seldom do it anymore."
--Catrike Rider.
 "Nearly 1,000 bicyclists die and over 130,000 are injured in crashes
that occur on roads in the United States every year.
https://www.cdc.gov/pedestrian-bike-safety/about/bicycle-safety.html
Oooh, so scary!
Over 40,000 motorists die each year. Over 7000 pedestrians die every year, hit by cars. In fact, go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_causes_of_death_by_rate  and scroll down to Road Injuries to compare bicycles, motorists, motorcyclists and pedestrians. Go farther down to compare with drownings and poisonings.
You should worry about bicycling about as much as you worry about being poisoned.
Why is it that some cyclists are so dedicated to pretending cycling is horribly dangerous? I mean, if you're timid, that's one thing. But there's no need to try to make others afraid.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 25 * Dead Vermont cyclist44AMuzi
13 Mar 25 `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist43Catrike Ryder
13 Mar 25  `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist42Jeff Liebermann
13 Mar 25   +- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Catrike Ryder
13 Mar 25   `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist40AMuzi
13 Mar 25    `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist39Jeff Liebermann
13 Mar 25     +* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist8Catrike Ryder
14 Mar 25     i+* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist2John B.
14 Mar 25     ii`- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Catrike Ryder
14 Mar 25     i`* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist5Jeff Liebermann
14 Mar 25     i +* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist3John B.
14 Mar 25     i i`* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist2AMuzi
14 Mar 25     i i `- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Frank Krygowski
14 Mar 25     i `- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Catrike Ryder
14 Mar 25     +* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist28Frank Krygowski
14 Mar 25     i`* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist27Jeff Liebermann
14 Mar 25     i `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist26Frank Krygowski
14 Mar 25     i  +- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Zen Cycle
14 Mar 25     i  +- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1AMuzi
14 Mar 25     i  `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist23Catrike Ryder
14 Mar 25     i   `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist22Frank Krygowski
14 Mar 25     i    +* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist6Zen Cycle
14 Mar 25     i    i`* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist5AMuzi
14 Mar 25     i    i +* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist3Catrike Ryder
14 Mar 25     i    i i`* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist2Roger Merriman
15 Mar 25     i    i i `- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1zen cycle
15 Mar 25     i    i `- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Frank Krygowski
14 Mar 25     i    `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist15Catrike Ryder
15 Mar 25     i     `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist14Frank Krygowski
15 Mar 25     i      `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist13Catrike Ryder
15 Mar 25     i       +* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist4John B.
15 Mar 25     i       i+- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Catrike Ryder
15 Mar 25     i       i+- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1zen cycle
15 Mar 25     i       i`- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Frank Krygowski
15 Mar 25     i       `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist8Roger Merriman
15 Mar 25     i        `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist7Catrike Ryder
15 Mar 25     i         `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist6Roger Merriman
15 Mar 25     i          +- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Catrike Ryder
15 Mar 25     i          `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist4Frank Krygowski
15 Mar 25     i           `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist3Catrike Ryder
15 Mar 25     i            `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist2Frank Krygowski
15 Mar 25     i             `- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Catrike Ryder
14 Mar 25     `* Re: Dead Vermont cyclist2AMuzi
14 Mar 25      `- Re: Dead Vermont cyclist1Jeff Liebermann

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal