Re: Job Offer

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:17:17 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
 

On 3/19/2025 4:16 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 3/19/2025 4:10 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:06:44 -0500, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

On 3/19/2025 4:03 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:38:24 -0500, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

On 3/19/2025 3:36 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:45:15 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br>
wrote:
>

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 05:11:53 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:00:00 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 04:14:24 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:50:31 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:38:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:22:05 -0500, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

On 3/18/2025 4:55 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 3/18/2025 4:05 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 3/18/2025 2:54 PM, Shadow wrote:

>
        PS Not all monarchies are "bad" per
se. As long as
they don't
steal too much and actually care for their
"subjects".
        []'s

>
I agree again.
>
But with every system, there are degrees of
plunder, death
and destruction. Some pursue mass murder,
some are
horrible, others merely awful, some bearable.

>
And as always, I'll ask: So what's the solution?
>

>
heh heh heh read some Marx! or any political
philosopher.
The dialectic is eternal.
>
It's perpetual conflict. Inherent to all human
societies.
>
In some cases civil and rhetorical, in others
with a sword,
knout, secret police or what have you.
>
Oh and don't discount 'civil and rhetorical'
which can be
pernicious and severe. Per Alphonse Capone,
"You can steal
more with a pen than a gun."  The modern
applications of
that usually start with, "For the children...".

>
>
No matter what kind of government, there will be
at least one person
who wants to take control of everybody else...
and believes it's only
right and proper that he does so.

>
Never mind governments... in any group.
Frankie???

>
It's a self esteem thing. When people take
directions from someone
with low esteem it makes them feel important. It
doesn't seem to
matter if the directions are forced on them as in
schools, or
voluntary as in social groups.
>
I think leaders are generally people with low
esteem who need
followers to make them feel important.
>
It's not, "I'm important so I will lead you." It's
more likely, "I
need to feel important, so follow me."

>
Sorry I can't agree with you, at least in all
circumstances.
>
Not many senior people in the military are weak
kneaded, quite simply
because their responsibilities are already mapped
out before hey get
the job."I appoint you as in charge of aircraft
maintenance" and "if
the airplanes don't fly as scheduled you lose your
job" while probably
not spoken is understood by both parties.

>
"Leaders" in every category are forever striving to
have more power
and get more control. I know that they believe they
are "serving," but
that's a bullshit attempt to justify their need to
feel important.

>
     Some leaders are different. Just like people are
different.
One of the first things you learn in medicine.
     Study "Pepe" Mujica and Luiz Inacio Lula da
Silva. They are as
poor today as they were when they took office......
     Mujica retired last year, and wants to spend the
rest of his
life on his farm. Lula retired in 2010 intending to
spend his last
days with his family, and only came back to fight the
fascists here in
Brazil.
     Even Jesus, who I believe existed (but as a
politician not a
character in a  rather badly written fairy tale) was
never a
power/money/control grabber. And he is still a
"Leader" today. LOL.
     []'s

>
Yeah, from what I read he seemed like an allright kind
of guy. Too bad
that so many people call him by the wrong name.
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman

>
Allah?

>
I read somewhere that his name started with "y," but I'm
pretty sure
they didn't have the English alphabet then. Being a
respect person, I
always reffered to him as Mr. Christ.
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman

>
You're maybe thinking YWH, whose name shall not be spoken.
Oh, and The Christ is an honorific not a name.

>
Yeah, I knew that. I was teasing. I do that sometimes.
>
-- C'est bon
Soloman

>
I know nothing of Aramaic but in Latin there's no J (or K,
U, W, Y) so maybe IVSUS in pre-English orthography.
>

>
Oops IESVS

  Could be.. I don't know. I believe that religion ought to be a fun
thing. Most churches are terrible dreary places, and most religious
"services" are monotonous and boring.
 I'm all for having fun.
--
C'est bon
Soloman