Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Job Offer

On 3/21/2025 2:21 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Mar 20 16:47:04 2025 Zen Cycle  wrote:

On 3/20/2025 3:34 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Tue Mar 18 17:18:50 2025 Zen Cycle  wrote:
>
Flunky, I don't know if you have a degree or not.

>
I guess you'll have to take my word for it.
>

But you've never worked as a real engineer

>
My work history and managers across the years disagree with you.
>

znd your comprehension of engineering and its principles is so little as to be nothing.

>
Like how PWM is used to test cables? lol. Tell us again how you designed
medical devices but never had to deal with the FDA, or how you designed,
tested, and released, wrote a 1000 page manual, and conducted training
for a comm board for the space station in less than a year.
>

The FACT that you speed every minute of your working hours on this newsgroup

>
Not a fact at all.
>

and your continuous bullshitting about what you do is proof of that.

>
I rarely discuss my work here, you're the one that continually makes up
things about what I do for work - one day I'm a manufacturing engineer,
then I'm a production engineer, then I'm a QC manager...
>

If you're self supporting that is fine. But don't tell us that you know shit from Shinola.

>
I know that using a peripheral 24 bit a/d converter in a water current
detection device is not necessary when the integral 10 bit version would
have done the job just as well. I also know no one in the industry uses
the term 'light lines' for fiber optics, and you can't use PWM to test
cables. You, meanwhile are insistent that you've witnessed a blatent
violation of the laws of physics when a dent popped out of your top tube
by riding the bike.
>

At your age you tell us you're a racer.

>
Yes, I race. This time of year it's Zwift.
>
https://www.strava.com/activities/13888341523
>
>

Then you try to pass off that you did 2, 200 mile rides at an average speed of 20 mph with climbing in them

>
No matter how many times you tell that lie, it will never become true.
That's your fabrication. I never wrote, implied, or posted anything even
remotely resembling that. For that fact, no one here believes I've ever
made such a claim, and everyone knows you're making it up.
>
>

We don't need you pretending to be important.
You quite obviously aren't.

>
I've asked this repeatedly - please post any reference where I ever
claimed that.

    Just show us your LinkedIn account if you want us to believe that anyone would recommend you.

no, because the first thing you'll do is start harassing my employer.

We don't need you lying about your 200 mile rides. After you posted that and I brought it to everyone's attention you rapidly wiped it off, but it was too late.

Complete fucking bullshit, an abject lie. There was never any ride I posted that was over 93 miles. In fact, I mentioned it back in august of   2023:
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/71JFsQP1Tcs/m/6m51v8dBAQAJ
"I don't brag about my mileage because it isn't noteworthy"
If I had done a 200 mile ride in one day, I would have mentioned it back then, dumbass.
It's something you made up, pure and simple, and even after three other people in this forum told you that you were wrong, you're still telling the lie as if anyone is going to believe you.

 And I absolutely love the way that you cannot even read O-scope signals to understand that it is using PWM in that commercial product to measure distance to any fault.

to the contrary, the waveforms you linked to weren't PWM. the fact is you don't know the difference between a PWM signal and a TDR signal.

 Tell everyone here what the conduction is in a swimming pool leak you damned fool?

lol...you don't even know what your product did. It was a water current detector to find leaks in swimming pools, not a water conduction tester - I wrote "water current detection device" which is exactly what the comments state. Water current is _not_ electrical current....and you wrote the program....sure, idiot.

The problem isn't that you don't need 24 bit doesn't mean you can even START to get by with 10 bits. What sort of idiot believes that fresh water is a strong conductor?

haha....
1) Given that I never made the claim it was intended to test conductivity, the point of how conductive fresh water is, is moot.
2) "Fresh" water encompass a wide variety of drinkable water, and may be high in mineral content - hence _quite_ conductive. It's _pure_ water that isn't conductive.
3) The comments in the code say its for detecting leaks in swimming pools - what kind of idiot thinks swimming pools are fresh water (with no chlorine or salt added)?

Why do you have to continually have to prove that you're not a design engineer. That 24 bit A-D was designed into that product by by Charley Button who has several international design awards and you're stupid enough to tell us that you know more than he.

no, I asked a question that you were unable to answer. Defaulting to authority is not the mark of a good engineer. _always_ ask questions. Not doing so only proves you to be a dullard.

All I did was program it to work.

No, you didn't. If you did, you would have known there was a peripheral A/D. You didn't know that until I told you.
Keep flailing sparky.
--
Add xx to reply