Re: When is fat too fat?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: When is fat too fat?
De : Sh (at) *nospam* dow.br (Shadow)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 22. Mar 2025, 14:59:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Shadow
Message-ID : <q9gttj1b8lrv40mm0621iqli9u2bkr63f3@4ax.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 20:19:17 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:48:20 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
(you'll need this whole link to get past the paywall)
>
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/lab-tested-40mm-road-tyres-are-faster-for-nearly-everyone-and-heres-why/?utm_term=3F94C1B0-2336-481F-9F48-87A3862079D2&lrh=1e399577e82ec4e44eb4d33bfcaad09d796bd8e1f682e0f7bf32df00ae420a83&utm_campaign=A8C132A5-BD9C-4737-AC90-016639AFEA3E&utm_medium=email&utm_content=42C26C62-AEF4-4540-8653-17C0A3DB0CE6&utm_source=SmartBrief
>
CyclingNews compares the latest 40c offering from Pirelli. It's a long
and well-written article, whether you agree with the findings or not.
>
The above URL ends with too much tracking information.  I trimmed it
off.  Now, it works:
>
<https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/lab-tested-40mm-road-tyres-are-faster-for-nearly-everyone-and-heres-why/>
>
Also (seperate issue) notice the greater than and less than symbols
wrapped around the URL.  If you don't want the URL mangled by a
browser line length limitation, add them when posting a URL.

I already did that for them yesterday. Anything after (and
including) the "?" is tracking datamining.. Chop it off. In ANY link.
[]'s

PS read the article, but unless you're into racing I don't
think the friction it will affect the average biker much. Just an
excuse to sell wider frames and wheels.
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Mar 25 * When is fat too fat?29Zen Cycle
21 Mar 25 +* Re: When is fat too fat?10Frank Krygowski
21 Mar 25 i+* Re: When is fat too fat?8AMuzi
21 Mar 25 ii+* Re: When is fat too fat?6Frank Krygowski
21 Mar 25 iii`* Re: When is fat too fat?5AMuzi
22 Mar 25 iii +- Re: When is fat too fat?1John B.
22 Mar 25 iii `* Re: When is fat too fat?3Frank Krygowski
22 Mar 25 iii  `* Re: When is fat too fat?2Roger Merriman
22 Mar 25 iii   `- Re: When is fat too fat?1Frank Krygowski
23 Mar 25 ii`- Re: When is fat too fat?1Jeff Liebermann
21 Mar 25 i`- Re: When is fat too fat?1Shadow
22 Mar 25 `* Re: When is fat too fat?18Jeff Liebermann
22 Mar 25  +- Re: When is fat too fat?1Shadow
22 Mar 25  `* Re: When is fat too fat?16Frank Krygowski
22 Mar 25   `* Re: When is fat too fat?15Jeff Liebermann
22 Mar 25    `* Re: When is fat too fat?14AMuzi
22 Mar 25     `* Re: When is fat too fat?13Jeff Liebermann
22 Mar 25      `* Re: When is fat too fat?12Frank Krygowski
23 Mar 25       `* Re: When is fat too fat?11zen cycle
23 Mar 25        `* Re: When is fat too fat?10Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25         `* Re: When is fat too fat?9Roger Merriman
24 Mar 25          `* Re: When is fat too fat?8zen cycle
24 Mar 25           `* Re: When is fat too fat?7Roger Merriman
24 Mar 25            `* Re: When is fat too fat?6zen cycle
24 Mar 25             +* Re: When is fat too fat?3Roger Merriman
24 Mar 25             i`* Re: When is fat too fat?2Zen Cycle
24 Mar 25             i `- Re: When is fat too fat?1Roger Merriman
24 Mar 25             `* Re: When is fat too fat?2Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25              `- Re: When is fat too fat?1Roger Merriman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal