Re: Job Offer

On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:05:34 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

On 3/22/2025 11:29 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 03:56:44 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 

It beats me why anyone has a problem with getting rid of illegal
members of terrorist outfit. At any rate, it appears that the
President does has the power to do what he did.

 
Because our government only functions effectively if everyone in
involved follows the rules.  Breaking the rules intentionally by our
elected and appointed officials is the way to a dictatorship, chaos
and eventual ruin.
 
As for Trump having the power to impound congressionally approved
funding, we've been here before.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impoundment_of_appropriated_funds>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Budget_and_Impoundment_Control_Act_of_1974>
The supreme court has already ruled that the president does not have
the right to impound congressionally approved funds.
 
(March 14, 2025)
"President Trump Actively Destroys the Rule of Law He Claims to Be
Restoring"
<https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/president-trump-actively-destroys-rule-law-he-claims-be-restoring>
 
Who are these "illegal members of terrorist outfit" that you mention?
The only terrorists I can find are rioters of January 6, 2021.  Just
to clarify, showing up to a protest march with a gun, is sufficient
for me to be considered a terrorist.
 
 

>
>
There were armed civilians with illegal possession at the
Capitol on 6 January?  That's big news, otherwise previously
unreported. Too bad none of the malicious prosecutors knew
about that or someone would have been charged.
>
Assuming you haven't read a newspaper in the past 5 years,
these items from this week may be helpful:
>
https://nypost.com/2025/03/20/us-news/ms-13-gangbanger-ambushes-colorado-cops-while-out-on-bond-for-3-felonies/
>
https://nypost.com/2025/03/21/us-news/gangbanger-wanted-for-human-trafficking-is-first-migrant-detained-under-trumps-newly-invoked-alien-enemies-act/
>
and way back in the Biden administration:
>
https://cwbchicago.com/2024/12/migrant-shot-another-migrant-for-murdering-a-third-migrant-prosecutors-say.html
>
among a few thousand other similar local stories nearly
everywhere.
>
Lest someone here again tries to conflate lawful resident
aliens with illegal aliens (both terms from US Statutes) our
recently arrived fellow USAians know the difference:
>
https://ktla.com/news/politics/ap-politics/ap-its-not-personal-trumps-deportation-efforts-find-support-among-south-florida-latinos/

But all these "anti Illegal Immigrants" is not new. When I brought my
first wife to the U.S. (wife of active duty USAF serviceman) there was
a hoard of documentation we had to filled out, in Japan, before we got
the approval for her to come to the U.S. And that was some 60 years
ago.

The first Federal anti immigrant seems to be  the Page Act, of 1875,
passed by the  Congress in 1875, and the Chinese Exclusion Act of
1882, are two early examples.
--
Cheers,

John B.