Re: Helmet efficacy test

On 3/25/2025 10:07 AM, Shadow wrote:

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 01:36:02 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 

On Mon Mar 24 17:13:48 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:

>
I'm stating my opinion in a discussion group. You should be able to
tolerate that, especially since over the years I've backed up my opinion
with mountains of data.
>
Please note that your statements above, about the nasty "leftover
affects" and "you can fall over bad just barely moving" apply exactly as
well to running. Yet I'll bet you'd hate hearing that all runners should
always wear a helmet when running.
>
The only real difference is you haven't yet expressed your hatred for
running helmets.

  +1
I would never use a helmet. Not in this climate. It's too hot,
my hair would become pudding.

>
>
>
>
Frank, you deo not run, do you? The entire human skeletal structure is designed by God specifically for running.

  God ? LOL.
Our "system" was "designed" to walk on all fours. Divide the
weight among 4 limbs.
Then tens of thousands of years ago a right-wing monkey
decided to show the others it was bigger and better and stood up. Put
it on social media and it became a "thing". Everyone wanted to be
"bigger and better".
Half the others voted to make it mandatory. And it still is...
Which is why knees and feet wear out so much and  people
complain of lumbago.
[]'s

Physical anthropologists* strongly disagree with that, as do I.
*who are, unlike "cultural anthropologists", actual scientists.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971