Re: Helmet efficacy test

On 3/25/2025 3:00 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Tue Mar 25 12:12:26 2025 Shadow  wrote:

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 02:15:54 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>

On Mon Mar 24 17:02:01 2025 Mark J cleary  wrote:

>
I like to wear helmet for extra protection against a fall. I do agree
that for me even running with a helmet would be good since I have no
balance to run anymore. However, Frank is I think in the minority about
helmets and while he may have data to support it sometimes we humans
overlook data. I rely sometimes only on intuition and what I think might
be good. I really don't understand the length's Frank goes to dis
helmets but maybe I am simply taking it more than it is. Small news
group so?

>
>
>
>
There weren 597,000 bicycle related traumatic brain injuries treated in emergency hospitals in the US alone.

>
    99% are "I think I might have bumped my head"
>
    PS Half a million brain injuries ? Is this over a month?
    No wonder they voted wrong.
    I'd vote wrong if I had a brain injury.
    []'s

>
Btain injuries are among the most serious consequences of bicycle accidents and include concussions, moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries and post-concussive syndrome.
>
But Frank tells us that these injuries do not exist in his universe.

>
>
>
>
Shadow, those are HOSPITAL EVALUATED injuries and not your idea of "I think I bumped my head". These are SHOWN on an MRI as was mine. I suggest if you don't understand what is being said that you simply ask a question. We are happy to answer your questions.
>
When they say "traumatic brain injuries, that meand they have been diagnosed either with x-rays which show major damage or Magnetic Resonance Imaging which shows everything.

 Maybe, maybe not.  The Medical Billing racket (formerly the medical services racket) doesn't report anything to anyone with an ulterior motive or angle, or kickback or some such.