Re: Helmet efficacy test

On 3/26/2025 1:09 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:02:28 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 3/26/2025 3:31 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 22:37:09 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 3/25/2025 12:27 PM, cyclintom wrote:

>
Half of all deaths under 40 are automobile accidents.

>
Despite seat belts and air bags, of course. Yet nobody nags at
motorists
to wear helmets.
>
In fact, I'll bet that when driving to or from the start of a ride,
all
the helmet wearing cyclists in this group leave their helmets
somewhere
in the car instead of wearing them. Because they're inside the car,
where far more brain injuries occur, they refuse to take advantage of
the added protection they so avidly proclaim!
>
Go figure!

>
But why do you nag at people not to wear helmets. Nobody is going to
change their minds about it.

<sigh> I have never told anyone "not to wear helmets."

>
<LOL> You argue that they serve no purpose. That's essentually the
same thing. It's dishonest for you claim otherwise.

>
Dumbass, you routinely claim team sports and participation in group
activities are useless. By your perverted logic, you're telling everyone
they shouldn't participate in team sports and group act ivies.
>
For you to claim otherwise is dishonest
>