Re: Helmet efficacy test

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Helmet efficacy test
De : jeffl (at) *nospam* cruzio.com (Jeff Liebermann)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 02. Apr 2025, 17:54:47
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <6ipquj9suatdtnvnbcogb9bmk2oqb02bhd@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:05:48 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Tue Mar 25 16:54:45 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:50:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 
On Mon Mar 24 21:35:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann  wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 02:04:34 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 
I haven't seen Keith since before I was injured so he wasn't marketing them under his name at that time.
 
You had a concussion in 2010.
 
<https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:6912346811772932096/>
"I got a severe concussion in 2010 that led to a type of seizures that
I didn't remember afterwards. This wasn't discovered and treated
properly until 2012 after 4 car wrecks luckily without any injuries"
 
Wavecel was founded in 2016.  There is no way anyone associated with
Wavecel could or would talk to you about their product in 2010 because
it didn't exist in 2010.  If the inventor(s) did a public disclosure
more than 12 months prior to when the patent was issued (2016), they
would risk having the invention considered as prior art.
 
Liebermann, we already know that you're missing a few rocks out of a full load. Is there some reason you cannot understand that I am recommending the Wavecel BECAUSE the old fashion foam helmet I was wearing didn't prevent traumatic brain injuries? Trek introduced me to the Wavecell in 2020. How does that fit your invention of time tables?
 
I am only interested in your claim to have "seen Keith since before I
was injured" which would be 2010, which presumably was when Keith
Bontrager told you all about Wavecel.
 
<https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:6912346811772932096/>
"I got a severe concussion in 2010 that led to a type of seizures that
I didn't remember afterwards. This wasn't discovered and treated
properly until 2012 after 4 car wrecks luckily without any injuries."
 
As far as the general public was concerned, there was no Wavecel
product prior to when it was founded and the patents were issued in
2016.  The Wavecel founders would never risk having their patent
invalidated because of a "prior art" claim.  Therefore, neither Keith
or the founders discussed the technology with you prior to 2016.
 
Whatever happened in 2020 is irrelevant.
>
>
>
Quote where I said that Bontrager told me anything about Wavecel? I heard about Wavecel from Pslo Slto Trek which is no longer in business thanks yo you best friend Biden, you both share growing sanity problems. Is there ANYTHING you don't consider yourself an expert at because you can find some sort of reference on Google? When you know nothing about nothing go right ahead and tell us about it. It is quite entertaining.

(Mar 24, 2025)
Message-ID: <B0kEP.112929$Xq5f.111799@fx38.iad>

<https://www.novabbs.com/rocksolid/article-flat.php?id=123032&group=rec.bicycles.tech#123032>

  "While Trek owned and financed Bontrager, Keith started
  thinking of this problem. Most injuries to cyclists that
  are serious are from concussions. Broaken bones generally
  heal and scraped skin regrows but brain damage from
  hitting your head hard while wearing a helmet that
  doesn't correctly allow deceleration from a head strike
  can caused even more damage than I recieved."

  "I have no memory of discussing my injury with Keith, but
  perhaps I did since I know him."

  "In any case, he designed the Wavecell helmet that used
  a 3D printing process which is designed to reduce the
  deceleration rate of a head blow from a fall and have
  used them since he began making them. Disconnected
  from Trek he is still making them but they are not of
  the same quality as the Trek versions."

Please read what I wrote.  If you had knowledge of the Wavecell
technology prior to the patent in 2016, it would have to have come
from the founders and inventors, who did NOT include Keith.  If they
told you about it, they would run the risk of losing the patent, so
they probably kept quiet or at least demanded an NDA (non-disclosure
agreement) from you before they would show you anything.  Otherwise,
your rant is a jumble of contrived lies and your chronology makes no
sense. 


--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 25 * Helmet efficacy test692AMuzi
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test78Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test77Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test33Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test32Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test21Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test10AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii    `* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii     `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii      +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i iii      i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii      `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
1 Apr 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Wolfgang Strobl
26 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test15AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test12Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test4AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test28Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Mark J cleary
25 Mar 25 i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test20Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
1 Apr 25 i   ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test14Zen Cycle
2 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test13Zen Cycle
3 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test11Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2John B.
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  iii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
5 Apr 25 i   i  ii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1zen cycle
4 Apr 25 i   i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test603Catrike Ryder
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test602Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test583Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test84Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i iii  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test74John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test71Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test492Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Shadow
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal