Re: Helmet efficacy test

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Helmet efficacy test
De : jeffl (at) *nospam* cruzio.com (Jeff Liebermann)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 03. Apr 2025, 18:10:51
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <afetuj1hl57eu288m8pcjmig6kc8cip1f1@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:47:25 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 4/3/2025 11:31 AM, cyclintom wrote:
 
Liebermann, no one but Flunky pays the slightest heed to you anymore. Why do you even bother posting?
>
I strongly disagree. Jeff is one of the most consistently erudite people
posting here. His posts almost always have value. Even the ones where he
points out your foolishness, Tom, have value. They save us the trouble
of doing the same.

Thanks.  I try to post things that might be of value to the reader.  I
usually delay posting for 20 to 60 minutes.  I use the delay to review
what I have written and determine if it's worth reading.  I also use
the delay to add references and double check my facts.  If it passes
the tests (spelling, logic tests, sanity check, etc) I post it to the
newsgroup.  My guess(tm) is I delete about 30% of my initial drafts
and rewrite from scratch about 10%.  I also use the delay to check if
there have been postings by others that might affect my writings.

What I've noticed is a increase in the number of "one-line" postings
consisting solely of an opinion.  No content, nothing of value
learned, no substantiation of the opinion, and probably of little
interest to anyone, except perhaps to those who are keeping score. I'm
not going to suggest what and how people should use the newsgroup. We
do not have moderators, not police and enforcers.  You can write and
post whatever you want.  I just prefer that the postings have some
value to the reader.

I wonder if, as a discipline for the rest of Lent at least, you could
give up insulting your betters.

Not me.  Detailing one individual's failures, inaccuracies and errors
has become a sport for me.  I wouldn't give it up for Lent, but I have
been known to be distracted by something better to keep me
entertained.  As for insulting other writers, I have been very careful
to be polite and NOT insult anyone else.  My memory isn't perfect and
I would be interested if someone could provide a link (or quote) for
something I wrote that they consider insulting.

Frank:  I don't know why you want me to give up insulting only my
"betters". There are people in RBT who are older than me (77). Whether
they are wiser or of a higher social position is subject to debate.
Is it acceptable for me to spend Lent practicing my insults on them?


--
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 25 * Helmet efficacy test692AMuzi
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test78Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test77Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test33Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test32Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test21Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test10AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii    `* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii     `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii      +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i iii      i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii      `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
1 Apr 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Wolfgang Strobl
26 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test15AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test12Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test4AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test28Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Mark J cleary
25 Mar 25 i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test20Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
1 Apr 25 i   ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test14Zen Cycle
2 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test13Zen Cycle
3 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test11Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2John B.
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  iii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
5 Apr 25 i   i  ii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1zen cycle
4 Apr 25 i   i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test603Catrike Ryder
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test602Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test583Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test84Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i iii  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test74John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test71Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test492Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Shadow
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal