Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Helmet efficacy test

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Helmet efficacy test
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 04. Apr 2025, 20:12:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vspavh$7ia8$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/2/2025 9:59 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Apr 2 09:56:56 2025 Zen Cycle  wrote:
On 4/1/2025 5:39 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Mar 26 17:11:00 2025 Zen Cycle  wrote:
On 3/26/2025 3:57 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Mar 26 18:51:39 2025 Roger Merriman  wrote:
cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue Mar 25 23:15:20 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
On 3/25/2025 12:36 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Mar 25 10:36:01 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
>
First, I don't know that's true. Based on your claims here, I think my
typical riding speed is faster than yours. I'm sure I couldn't keep up
with Zen or Mark, but I suspect most of us old guys here would ride at
similar speeds. I know that on the club rides I attend (I'm typically
the oldest of the attendees) I usually finish in the front half of the
group, and often first. Not that they're races. I just enjoy speeding up
at times.
>
Not that it matters. I dispute the implication that faster riders
naturally crash more. It takes miles of riding to get fast, and people
with miles of experience tend to be more skillful.
>
You may be an exception.
>
>
>
>
Frank, obviously you do not ride with a Garmin and believe that my
claim of riding an average soeed of 11 mph is slow.
>
You're right. I don't use a Garmin. I still use ordinary cyclometers - a
couple Avocets that I've managed to keep running, and a couple Cateyes,
etc. They give me average speed. 11 mph _is_ slow. I don't think I've
ever averaged that slow unless on a recreation ride with my wife,
grandkids or a good friend who is quite slow.
>
>
>
>
Those meters only sverage moving speed. You are supposed to be an
engineer and you don't understand the effects of stop lights and a 30-45
minute pause at a coffee shop on a meter that measures average speed from
total time from turning the meter on? All I can say is that you're some kind of engineer.
>
>
As do Garmin connect and Strava ie doesn?t count the stationary time, aka
waiting at traffic lights or time at the cafe or so on.
>
>
>
>
I have an 830 and a 1030 and neither one of those has an autostop feature.
>
lol...wow...._ALL_ Garmin cycling computers have an autopause function,
They've had that feature since Garmin first released cycling computers
in 2006.
>
830 user manual
>
https://www8.garmin.com/manuals/webhelp/edge830/EN-US/Edge_830_OM_EN-US.pdf
>
Page 54
>
Using Auto Pause
You can use the Auto Pause feature to pause the timer automatically when
you stop moving or when your speed drops below a specified value. This
feature is helpful if your ride includes stop lights or other places
where you need to slow down or stop.
NOTE: History is not recorded while the timer is stopped or paused.
1 Select > Activity Profiles.
2 Select a profile.
3 Select Auto Features > Auto Pause.
4 Select an option:
? Select When Stopped to pause the timer automatically when you stop moving.
? Select Custom Speed to pause the timer automatically when your speed
drops below a specified value.
5 If necessary, customize optional time data fields (Adding a Data
Screen, page 51).
>
1030 user manual
>
https://www8.garmin.com/manuals/webhelp/edge1030/EN-US/Edge_1030_OM_EN-US.pdf
>
Page 53
>
Using Auto Pause
You can use the Auto Pause feature to pause the timer automatically when
you stop moving or when your speed drops below a specified value. This
feature is helpful if your ride includes stop lights or other places
where you need to slow down or stop.
NOTE: History is not recorded while the timer is stopped or paused.
1 Select > Activity Profiles.
2 Select a profile.
3 Select Auto Features > Auto Pause.
4 Select an option:
? Select When Stopped to pause the timer automatically when you stop moving.
? Select Custom Speed to pause the timer automatically when your speed
drops below a specified value.
5 If necessary, customize optional time data fields (Adding a Data
Screen, page 50).
>
>
And if you push "stop" on the clock, when you restart, they restart the
mileage from zero. Now it has saved the previous ride and you can
downlooad the same total mileage. But if you leave it, it measures the
time from start to finish regardless of speed.
>
>
>
>
Why do you talk about an auto-pause function but you can't point it out?
>
Hmm...so I copy/pasted from the manuals exactly how to enable auto
pause, and you interpret that as "you can't point it out"?
>
I can find where you can manually pause a ride and then pick it up by turning it back on with Express, but not auto-poause.
>
That's because you're an idiot and an asshole, who is so blindingly
ignorant and arrogant that you claim I'm 'unable to point out how to use
the autopause function' when I copy/pasted the information directly from
the manual (as well as gave you links to the manuals so you could
download them).
>
FWIW, I have a Garmin 530 and 745, the instructions are identical for
setting up on both of those, which I have done.
>
You are pitifully beyond all help.
    If you follow those direction exactly, you do not find the correct setup screen. So if you set your own up why didn't you mention that error?
There is no error, as usual, you're doing it wrong

 But I discovered the error, got to the setup screen and I think that it is setup now. Though I will have to try it out and see if it works Saturday.
 However, the latest software update has made it unnesesary snxce it now tells you the moving average rather than an overall average. So all of your "work" is for nothing. But then since you don't believe in work,Liebermann must have looked it up and sent it to you.
Face it, you fucked up, and you're too arrogant to admit it.
--
Add xx to reply

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 25 * Helmet efficacy test692AMuzi
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test78Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test77Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test33Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test32Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test21Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test10AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii    `* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii     `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii      +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i iii      i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii      `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
1 Apr 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Wolfgang Strobl
26 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test15AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test12Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test4AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test28Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Mark J cleary
25 Mar 25 i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test20Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
1 Apr 25 i   ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test14Zen Cycle
2 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test13Zen Cycle
3 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test11Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2John B.
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  iii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
5 Apr 25 i   i  ii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1zen cycle
4 Apr 25 i   i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test603Catrike Ryder
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test602Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test583Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test84Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i iii  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test74John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test71Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test492Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Shadow
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal