Re: RE: Re: Helmet efficacy test

On 4/4/2025 5:24 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Apr 3 17:26:01 2025 Roger Merriman  wrote:

Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 4/3/2025 12:05 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Thu Apr 3 11:47:25 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:

On 4/3/2025 11:31 AM, cyclintom wrote:

>
Liebermann, no one but Flunky pays the slightest heed to you anymore.
Why do you even bother posting?

>
I strongly disagree. Jeff is one of the most consistently erudite people
posting here. His posts almost always have value. Even the ones where he
points out your foolishness, Tom, have value. They save us the trouble
of doing the same.
>
I wonder if, as a discipline for the rest of Lent at least, you could
give up insulting your betters.

>
Since my answer to his posting was to point out that his claim was that
the face is not part of the head, I am not at all surprised thaty you
consider him erudite. Apparently you don't believe that ANY protection
for the head is any better than your cycling cap. I guess stupid runs in
tribes and you, Liebermann and Flunky all wear the same warpaint.

>
Tom, your constant stream of insults really does not make your targets
look worse. It only makes you look (even) worse.
>

>
Indeed it?s a poor look!

    Roger, I agree to the extent that I am responding to people that could not even earn a living for themselves in private industry telling us that I don't know what I'm talking about. You seem like a competent working man and I suggest you stop supporting idiots because you think that I have started any of this.

He isn't, and you did.

That does not make you look very good either.

You have absolutely _no_ room to talk.

 I said that I updated my Garmin and that it took several minutes and that the operation of the instrument completely changed and you said that I was mistaken.

No, he didn't. He wrote that the unit has an autopause function.

You were going strictly on the version number which is probably manually changed.

Autopause always was and still is a feature, regardless of the firmware version.

I worked as an EE and senior software engineer for 50 years. I don't know what you do but you should be careful talking about that sort of stuff.

You weren't a senior EE for 50 years. You were barely competent as a technician, You repeatedly have demonstrated you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

 Do you think that it is a poor look because I corrected you?

Pay attention, dumbass, the poor look he's referring to is due to you hatred towards anyone who proves you wrong and refers to buy into your bullshit.

Or because I find people like Frank and Liebermann who never worked in commercial business almost entirely wrong all of the time?

You haven't proven him wrong on any issue you've blathered on about.

Liebermann who doesn't know that your face is part of your head? Or Krygowski who claims that his cycling cap is as effective at warding off head injuries as a helmet is? Wear a helmet or not, as you wish but never pretend that a helmet doesn't offer at least some protection. I have published articles on the failings of helmets and was pro helmet only to the end that it did protect you from mild injuries.
 What about Flunky who tells us he is an important EE at his company,

I did? Please provide a reference to where I ever claimed that. Oh, wait, I know, it was about the time I wrote that I rode went 200 miles in one ride....right?

so important that he spends every minute of every day on this group. When I was working I had no time for anything else.
 Doesn't that tell you how important that guy" is?

Too bad you never had the trust of management to the extent that they didn't watch you like hawk.