Sujet : Re: About argument
De : Sh (at) *nospam* dow.br (Shadow)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 05. Apr 2025, 22:59:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Shadow
Message-ID : <3c93vj9bo2c9lamtolompnqo59k993ac6j@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <
am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.
>
Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
give up and throw punches:
To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.
>
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/
I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?
>
with photos
More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
[]'s
-- Don't be evil - Google 2004We have a new policy - Google 2012Google Fuchsia - 2021
About argument
Re: About argument
