Sujet : Re: About argument
De : mcleary08 (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Mark J cleary)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 06. Apr 2025, 01:37:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vssici$3k80b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.
>
Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
give up and throw punches:
To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.
>
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/
I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?
>
with photos
More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
[]'s
Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred. All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without life there is nothing.
-- Deacon Mark