Sujet : Re: About argument
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 07. Apr 2025, 15:38:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vt0o0v$3vi0o$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/6/2025 8:29 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 4/6/2025 2:26 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Sat Apr 5 18:59:49 2025 Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.
>
Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
give up and throw punches:
>
To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.
>
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls- moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/
>
I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?
>
with photos
>
More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
>
>
>
Here in California girls will get pregnant just so they ccould kill the baby. During Obama it was an "in" thing. The media would paint them as heartbroken having to get rid of the baby. So heart broken that they would do it time and time again.
Amidst our very serious moral, legal and policy problems in this area, that it not only wrong, it implies you haven't met many actual humans.
+1
Thanks Andrew.
-- Add xx to reply
About argument
Re: About argument
