Re: About argument

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 19:37:38 -0500, Mark J cleary
<mcleary08@comcast.net> wrote:

On 4/5/2025 4:59 PM, Shadow wrote:

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:14:48 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
 

At least here on RBT we do beat a subject to death with
keyboards, leaving no aspect of any discussion unturned.
>
Elsewhere, those who fail to form compelling argument just
give up and throw punches:

 
To be fair, you can't argue with crazy.

>
https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/pro-life-activist-recalls-moment-she-was-punched-during-harlem-interview/

 
I'm interested in knowing if it worked. Did the pro-lifer
suddenly start caring about people AFTER they were born?
Imagine less un-loved and abandoned children. Surely a plus?

>
with photos

 
More interested in psych evaluations than photos...
[]'s

Interesting way to put it as if the pro-life person did not somehow care
for people already. The act of life and the making of life is sacred.
All human life is sacred in that it is made in the image and likeness of
God. I am all pro-life there is nothing else as important since without
life there is nothing.

Are "illegal" immigrants a "life form"?
IYVO, of course.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021