Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 4/8/2025 8:31 AM, AMuzi wrote:Yes that's right, and very well documented. US support overall was voluminous and critical to the effort.On 4/8/2025 6:19 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:In terms of weapons, maybe, but myriad sources show supplies via the lend-lease act were critical to the effort.On 4/7/2025 4:45 PM, Shadow wrote:>On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 16:55:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>>
wrote:
>Stalin literally killed millions simply because they had money. And then when there was no one else to grow the food>
I don't think ANY of the rich guys grew any food. The peasants
grew the food.
>and build the weapons Hitler who himself was nothing more than a closet communist>
Hitler was a far-right fascist. Something like Musk. First
thing he did was kill all the communists. Only then did he move on to
gypsies and eventually Jews....
>
>under the mantle of socialism attacked them and nearly succeeded. And would have it not for the US supplying arms and ammunition to the brave Russian people at Stalingrad.>
The Russians used Russian arms. Stop watching Hollywood
propaganda. It's obsolete. The cold war is over...
[]'s
Tommy has repeatedly spoken glowingly of Putin and the current russian regime.
>
Although US aid/support to the Soviets was significant and some may argue dispositive overall, the contribution at Stalingrad was negligible if not nil.
>
Stalingrad:
https://totalmilitaryinsight.com/weapons-used-by-both-sides/
https://www.history.com/articles/battle-stalingrad-turning- point
https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/pubs/fs/46345.htm
Granted, written from the point of view of the victors, but not refuted by USSR or the Russian Federation.
>
Overall US support during The Great Patriotic War:
https://archive-share.america.gov/america-sent-equipment- to-soviet- union-in-world-war-ii/
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.