Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:I think you and I have different definitions of beam shapes, and different standards. (Andrew will be thinking "Of course!")[about headlight beam optics, generating "specially shaped beams":]Both of which have shaped beams, Raveman and Knog both claim road specific
I don't think that's true at all. Take a look at some of the beam shots
at this site: https://bikelightdatabase.com/beamshots
>
Or go to
https://road.cc/content/feature/roadcc-front-bike-lights-beam-test-310999
and look at the beam shapes of the Ravemen and the Knog.
beams and reviews tend in Road.cc and others mention this, Raveman make lot
out of their High and low beams, though they are far from the first to do
that sort of thing!
I get why they do this, but a camera isn’t an eye and it’s rather false if
not misleading to use beam shots.
--In the past few years, there's been more attention to optics, but I
think there are still plenty of small manufacturers who use rotationally
symmetrical optics. Peter White has an explanation of why those are far
from optimum, at https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/plight.php
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.