Re: Electric bicycles, social policy & culture

On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 08:52:26 +0200, Wolfgang Strobl
<news51@mystrobl.de> wrote:

Am Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:40:59 -0400 schrieb Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>:
>

On 4/10/2025 12:09 PM, AMuzi wrote:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/are-e-bikes-a-godsend-or-the-road-to-
perdition-an-amish-community-is-torn/ar-AA1CAple

>
A couple remarks:

...
>

Holmes County, Ohio is quite hilly. We did a weekend there, riding
tandems with our best friends. One little side road marked the first
time we ever had to dismount and walk a hill despite our tandem's low
gearing. I can see why the Amish there would be motivated to accept
electric assist.

>
Sure. Who wouldn't?   But how many people of those who switched from a
bicycle to a motorized bike during the last decade are Amish people?
Wikipedia tells me that only 0.12% of the US population are Amish, so as
a first guess I'd expect > 99% of e-bike users not to be Amish.
>

>
Finally, while I'll never be Amish, I can admire that a culture has
priorities other than "How much shit can we buy before we die?"
Community is very important to the Amish, and community is a good thing.

>
But switching from bicycles to motorized bikes isn't a good thing in
general, especially not in a country known for their obesity crisis.
>
IMO, this is marketing for a motorized vehicle whose design mainly
consists of giving riders the illusion that they are riding a bicycle.

I see adults on the bike trails traveling at 15/20 MPH and peddling at
30 RPM, if at all. They wave at me, pretending, I suppose, that they
and I have something in common. I see many school age kids riding
their electric bikes, scooters, and such. 

When did "exercise" become something to avoid?

--
C'est bon
Soloman