Sujet : Re: Helmet efficacy test
De : am (at) *nospam* yellowjersey.org (AMuzi)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 15. Apr 2025, 19:50:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Message-ID : <vtm9qh$b478$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/15/2025 1:46 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:20:51 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 4/15/2025 12:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 4/15/2025 8:56 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>
But here, the rise in anti-vax was driven by upper class
suburban mothers and Hollywood celebrities who skew soft
left. (as with any social phenomenon there are of course
many flavors of opinion and politics) It was unusual
before that quack Wakefield (1998?) but snowballed after
that.
>
The anti-vax movement was driven by ignorant anti-
scientists. Yes, it's bounced around the political spectrum,
but the often deliberate ignorance has been and remains
constant.
>
>
>
Yes, I agree with that. Wasn't helped by deliberate lies
and not only by Wakefield.
I submitted to two doses of the Covid "vaccine," and then I realised
that the jackass who was directing it (Fauci) and all the other scams
(masks and six foot spaces) was partially responsible for creating
Covid.
--
C'est bon
Soloman
Note dates of these itemshttps://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18787https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21487-- Andrew Muziam@yellowjersey.orgOpen every day since 1 April, 1971
Helmet efficacy test
Re: Helmet efficacy test