Re: Helmet efficacy test

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:50:57 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
 

On 4/15/2025 1:46 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:20:51 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>

On 4/15/2025 12:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

On 4/15/2025 8:56 AM, AMuzi wrote:

>
But here, the rise in anti-vax was driven by upper class
suburban mothers and Hollywood celebrities who skew soft
left.  (as with any social phenomenon there are of course
many flavors of opinion and politics)  It was unusual
before that quack Wakefield (1998?) but snowballed after
that.

>
The anti-vax movement was driven by ignorant anti-
scientists. Yes, it's bounced around the political spectrum,
but the often deliberate ignorance has been and remains
constant.
>
>

>
Yes, I agree with that.  Wasn't helped by deliberate lies
and not only by Wakefield.

>
I submitted to two doses of the Covid "vaccine," and then I realised
that the jackass who was directing it (Fauci) and all the other scams
(masks and six foot spaces) was partially responsible for creating
Covid.
>
--
C'est bon
Soloman

>
>
Note dates of these items
>
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18787
>
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21487

  "Editors’ note, March 2020 We are aware that this story is being used
as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus
causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is
true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of
the coronavirus."
 What scientists believed that then?  What scientists believe that
today?
--
C'est bon
Soloman