Re: Helmet efficacy test

Liste des GroupesRevenir à rb tech 
Sujet : Re: Helmet efficacy test
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 16. Apr 2025, 18:08:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <3rovvjpr1fv0pgppgntoraaekcig09295b@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:17:05 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 4/16/2025 7:03 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 05:56:03 -0400, zen cycle
<funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
 
On 4/16/2025 5:25 AM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 04:16:27 -0400, floriduh dumbass excreted
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 09:02:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:46:46 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:20:51 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>
On 4/15/2025 12:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 4/15/2025 8:56 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>
But here, the rise in anti-vax was driven by upper class
suburban mothers and Hollywood celebrities who skew soft
left.  (as with any social phenomenon there are of course
many flavors of opinion and politics)  It was unusual
before that quack Wakefield (1998?) but snowballed after
that.
>
The anti-vax movement was driven by ignorant anti-
scientists. Yes, it's bounced around the political spectrum,
but the often deliberate ignorance has been and remains
constant.
>
>
>
Yes, I agree with that.  Wasn't helped by deliberate lies
and not only by Wakefield.
>
I submitted to two doses of the Covid "vaccine," and then I realised
that the jackass who was directing it (Fauci) and all the other scams
(masks and six foot spaces) was partially responsible for creating
Covid.
>
Strange isn't it. The vigorous enforcement, of exactly the same rules,
that you describe, were blamed for Thailand's rather amazingly low
Covid rates and deaths..
>
U.S.  Total cases per 1 million population - 337,912
           Total Deaths per 1 M population       - 3685
>
Thailand Total cases per 1 million population - 68,069
                   Total deaths per 1 M population - 494
>
I suspect there were many factors involved. Fauci admitted that the
cloth masks were worthless
>
No, he didn't, dumbass. That's you  - once again - eagerly swallowing
maga spunk becasue it fits you arrogant and ignorant view point. He said
this:
>
"From a broad public-health standpoint, at the population level, masks
work at the margins – maybe 10 percent. But for an individual who
religiously wears a mask, a well-fitted KN95 or N95, it’s not at the
margin. It really does work."
>
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/04/24/magazine/dr-fauci-pandemic.html
>
It's a nuance that you're unable to understand.
>
and that the six foot rule came out of thin
air.
>
again, more eager spunk swallowing.
>
"like many respiratory viruses, SARS-CoV-2 can also be spread by larger
droplets from coughs or sneezes: these drops tend to fall to the ground
relatively quickly, and six feet of distancing was widely seen by
experts as a reasonable benchmark for avoiding that type of exposure"
>
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/marjorie-taylor-greenes-attacks-of-fauci-over-covids-six-foot-rule-not-based/
>
Besides, what the fuck to you care? As far as you're concerned, six foot
proximity to other humans is way too close for you anyways.
>
>
The places in the USA that had the strictest rules and the most
vigorous enforcement faired no better. IMO, it was all smoke and
mirrors.
>
that should be 'IMIAAO'
Your ignorant and arrogant opinion
>
>
FWIW my wife and I got Covid even after taking the vaccine.
>
No one ever said the vaccine will prevent you from getting covid
dumbass. It reduced the likelyhood and in case of infection reduced the
severity.
>
floriduh dumbass - making the dumbshine state proud,
>
>
>
I have no idea what Mr Fauci said about anything but I would comment
that doctors and medical staff wear them in Thailand, Singapore,
Indonesia, and medical evacuation airplanes to my personal experience.
>
Gee john, based on this little exchange between you and the dumbass, is
it any wonder why american tourists consistently present as obese and
stupid?
 
"Fauci admits that masks don't work for the public at large but still
absurdly claims masks work on an individual basis,"
https://www.newsweek.com/anthony-fauci-mask-admission-backlash-coronavirus-1824364
 
He [Fauci] said the 6-foot guideline “sort of just appeared” and
wasn’t based on any data, and that such a study would be difficult to
do.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/jun/06/did-fauci-say-he-made-up-covid-19-rules-on-social/
>
The same oh-so-proudly-independent guy who repeatedly claims "the media"
is worthless now turns to media in an attempt to salvage his argument.
But his lack of reading comprehension leaves him unaware of his logical
failures.

That's from the guy who says that correlation implies causation..

As for the media, it's reasonably good at quoting people which is what
I used it for here to demonstrate that Fauci was a phony.

--
C'est bon
Soloman

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 25 * Helmet efficacy test692AMuzi
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test78Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test77Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test33Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test32Frank Krygowski
24 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test21Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test10AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii    `* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii     `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii      +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i iii      i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii      `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i iii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
1 Apr 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i i ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Wolfgang Strobl
26 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i i   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test15AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test12Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test5Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i iii   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test4AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i ii  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii   `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Shadow
25 Mar 25 i i `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Shadow
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test28Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Mark J cleary
25 Mar 25 i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Wolfgang Strobl
25 Mar 25 i  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Helmet efficacy test20Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
1 Apr 25 i   ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test14Zen Cycle
2 Apr 25 i   i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test13Zen Cycle
3 Apr 25 i   i  +* Re: Helmet efficacy test11Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2John B.
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
3 Apr 25 i   i  i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  iii`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
3 Apr 25 i   i  ii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Roger Merriman
5 Apr 25 i   i  ii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1zen cycle
4 Apr 25 i   i  i+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  i`- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Jeff Liebermann
4 Apr 25 i   i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i   `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
26 Mar 25 i    `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Zen Cycle
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test603Catrike Ryder
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test602Mark J cleary
24 Mar 25 i +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i +* Re: Helmet efficacy test583Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test6John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii+- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
26 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i+* Re: Helmet efficacy test84Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii+* Re: Helmet efficacy test9Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test8Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test4Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i iii i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i iii i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test2Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 i iii i  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski
26 Mar 25 i iii  +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Catrike Ryder
26 Mar 25 i iii  `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Roger Merriman
25 Mar 25 i ii`* Re: Helmet efficacy test74John B.
25 Mar 25 i ii +* Re: Helmet efficacy test71Rolf Mantel
25 Mar 25 i ii +- Re: Helmet efficacy test1AMuzi
25 Mar 25 i ii `- Re: Helmet efficacy test1Frank Krygowski
25 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Helmet efficacy test492Catrike Ryder
25 Mar 25 i `* Re: Helmet efficacy test17Shadow
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Helmet efficacy test7Zen Cycle
25 Mar 25 `* Re: Helmet efficacy test3Frank Krygowski

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal