Liste des Groupes | Revenir à rb tech |
On 4/18/2025 10:25 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:>On 4/18/2025 3:44 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:23:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 4/17/2025 10:08 PM, AMuzi wrote:>On 4/17/2025 9:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:>>>
Oh, and "speech" in the form of millionaire or
corporate campaign
contributions is an abomination.
How so?
If I have an individual right to free speech (and I
absolutely do), then
why may my right be curtailed when I join with others
of like mind?
>
It's a long standing feature of common law (well before
USA) that
corporations are fictitious persons, entitled to rights
of their
composite individuals when they act as one.
Common law or not, I think the idea of a corporation
being a "person" is
nuts. But even if one accepts their "personhood," they
should be limited
to the amount of speech that _one_ person can produce.
>
And "speech" measured in dollars is an abomination.
The party that spent by far, the most money in the 2024
Presidential
campaign lost that election by a significant margin.
dumbass still swallowing magatard spunk...
Trump 49.8%
Harris 48.3%
1.5 % is _not_ a significant margin. In terms of US
Presidential elections it ranks as the 11th closest margin
(out of 47).
You and I agree on that.
>
Others see it differently:
>
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-14461599/stephen-smith-demolishes-joy-behard.html
>
Mr Smith cites actual undisputed facts yet makes a very
different conclusion. As is his right, but I don't agree.
>
That said, the Presidential elections of 2016 and again in
2024 featured higher expenditure by the 2d place candidate
which does cast a shadow over widespread irrational fear of
'money in politics'. We're a nation saturated in media of
all sorts and promoting a message, any message, is
inherently expensive to garner any attention at all. Plus
repetition of the message. Money is classically necessary
but not sufficient.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.