Re: Helmet efficacy test

On 4/19/2025 6:10 AM, John B. wrote:

On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 05:49:00 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
 

On 19 Apr 2025 09:01:43 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>

Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

On 4/18/2025 11:25 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:

>

On 4/18/2025 3:44 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:

On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:23:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>

On 4/17/2025 10:08 PM, AMuzi wrote:

On 4/17/2025 9:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

>
Oh, and "speech" in the form of millionaire or corporate campaign
contributions is an abomination.

>
How so?
If I have an individual right to free speech (and I absolutely do),
then
why may my right be curtailed when I join with others of like mind?
>
It's a long standing feature of common law (well before USA) that
corporations are fictitious persons, entitled to rights of their
composite individuals when they act as one.

>
Common law or not, I think the idea of a corporation being a
"person" is
nuts. But even if one accepts their "personhood," they should be
limited
to the amount of speech that _one_ person can produce.
>
And "speech" measured in dollars is an abomination.

>
The party that spent by far, the most money in the 2024 Presidential
campaign lost that election by a significant margin.

>
dumbass still swallowing magatard spunk...
Trump 49.8%
Harris 48.3%
>
1.5 % is _not_ a significant margin. In terms of US Presidential
elections it ranks as the 11th closest margin (out of 47).

>
Gosh, math can be hard! (For some.)
>
And I see the excuses are being piled in heaps. But despite the
irrelevant squirming, the _margin_ was minuscule.
>

Does seem to be a fairly low margin, as ever with politics and folks who
are true believers, they are fairly immune to facts!
>
In uk still have folks saying Jeremy Corbyn (US Bernie Saunders?) was
should have won, if X had happened!
>
Failing to remember that his vote or Labour rather was hugely helped by the
Tory party dismissing him as threat for all of his failures and faults he
is a campaigner, plus they did some staggering home goals!
>
Hence when Boris called a snap election and didn’t make those mistakes he
did get very healthy majority which he managed to fuckup which is him all
over really!
>
Roger Merriman

>
The significance was that every state vote count swung towards the
GOP, and that the popular vote was also for the GOP. That was a
significant swing towards the GOP in spite of the playing down by the
Democrats.
>
The left is making a big issue out of Bernie Sanders who is a self
described socialist. As such, he has about the same chance of becoming
President as do I. Socialism doesn't fly very high in the USA.
>

Social Security. Aid to unwed mothers. War on poverty. Food Stamps.
Unemployment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_programs_in_the_United_States
Some $717 billion (in 2011) in Federal assistance.
 

Which is why our modern Federal government is aptly described as an insurance company with an army.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971