Sujet : Re: aging and riding
De : theise (at) *nospam* panix.com (Ted Heise)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 01. May 2025, 14:27:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : My own, such as it is
Message-ID : <slrn1016tls.a9f.theise@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (NetBSD)
On Thu, 1 May 2025 07:13:57 -0400,
zen cycle <
funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 4/30/2025 6:25 PM, Mark J cleary wrote:
Even 6 years ago I would jump on bike and ride 50 and come
back and go for say 4-5 hours easy. Now I tell you after 2 I
am getting wiped. This painting is like painting a bike you
have to mask things to avoid problems.
Joe Friel's book Fast After 50 has detailed tables showing the
performance loss with aging of age-group competitors. Let's
just say it isn't linear (and rather depressing TBH). I can't
find any snips from his book online, but this is a pretty close
representation:
https://www.whyiexercise.com/images/jogging-hiking-aging-decline-estimate.jpg
which is from here:
https://www.whyiexercise.com/aging-and-exercise.html
Not discussed there is the time to recover, which is also
non-linear. Last fall I went on a rather hilly 75 mile ride. We
weren't exactly hammering, but I was surprised at how whipped I
was the next day - And that was at the end of a summer of
training/racing.
You guys are bumming me out. At 69, it feels as if the
progression on that chart is about right--at least for me.
-- Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA