Re: RE: Re: Disc's without power

On 5/3/2025 4:33 PM, cyclintom wrote:

On Sat May 3 13:43:07 2025 AMuzi  wrote:

>
There are many definitions of 'engineer':
>
https://tinyurl.com/ctcmxu6n

 Unfortunately you are all too correct. Flunky, Liebermann and Krygowski have been using the useless definition "has a degree in engineering".

I've had the pleasure of working with two very talented non-degreed engineers in my career. You wouldn't have been qualified to fetch their coffee.

 My definition is "worked commercially for many companies solving real problems in the real world that keep these companies in business." These three could not qualify using that definition.

Your definition is irrelevant and useless.
<snipped typical tommy insulting frank rant>

 As an example: someone just brought out a dcevice which is nothing but a reel with an electric motor on it that will switch any mechanical rear derailleur. This is very cleaver and were this released 5 years ago it would have killed the entire Di2 BS. It is nothing but a radio link that entirely eliminates the wires. Mechanical engineers with degrees are scarce among bicycle parts designers. But that electrification of manual derailleurs shows just how clever they can be. And simply changing the reel pull, it would work on SRAM, Shimano, Microshift and other Chinese parts makers and even Campagnolo - 10, 11 and 12 speeds. The drive mechanism doesn't have to change.
 

And you talk about word salad?

 Flunky is the one person that I can't find anything positive to say. No one I knew could EVER be able to sit on newsgroups all day.

And you still haven't met anyone working full-time who sits on newsgroups all day.

Most had so much work that they could only occassionally attend at night. Over and over he makes comments that could come from Harris and her word salads.

(see bizarre derailleur electronic conversion claim above)

He hasn't shown to me that he has much education other than some QC standards used on government projects. And knowing them is far different from using them since the numbers are in the requirement documents.

Let's consider the fact that you claimed to be in charge developing medical electronics but never had to work with FDA design requirements (and yes, software, firmware, and hardware products, applications, and development process are subject to scrutiny under FDA medical electronics standards and requirements)