Sujet : Re: silca and Tariffs
De : funkmaster (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Zen Cycle)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 06. May 2025, 14:59:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vvd4ki$32c2m$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/5/2025 9:36 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 05 May 2025 19:03:55 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
Not salaries, wages, and yes the management went along with the
demands, partly because of laws that forced people to join the union
if they wanted the job and also the governments' refusal to protect
those who wanted to pass through picket lines and work. It was
government, management, and the unions.
The closed shop, which required employees to join a union, officially
ended in 1947. Unfortunately, the unions found various ways to
continue the practice mostly by re-defining a "closed shop".
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_shop#United_States>
"The US government does not permit union shops in any federal agency,
regardless of state laws."
The difference is that a private company or state agency can enter into a union contract which can restrict the company/agency from hiring non-union employess. In Massachusetts, labor law allows any employees to refuse to join a union, but the union contract _may_ still force the employee to pay dues even if they refuse to join a union.
-- Add xx to reply
silca and Tariffs
Re: silca and Tariffs
