Sujet : Re: DOGE report
De : Soloman (at) *nospam* old.bikers.org (Catrike Ryder)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.techDate : 09. May 2025, 12:59:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <e8rr1kdsq6dhh6q0iqg26n1sj1qmecakin@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 9 May 2025 13:11:22 +0200, Rolf Mantel <
news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:
Am 09.05.2025 um 11:54 schrieb Catrike Ryder:
On Fri, 9 May 2025 11:33:32 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
wrote:
Am 08.05.2025 um 22:45 schrieb cyclintom:
On Thu May 8 12:28:55 2025 Catrike Ryder wrote:
On Thu, 08 May 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:
>
On Thu, 08 May 2025 10:38:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
There's no such thing as "trans women."
>
"Trans woman"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_woman>
"Transgender women are women who were assigned male at birth"
>
Those are males. Males are not women.
>
You will note that there are no men who were born women.
>
Yes there are. There's even one in my daughter's class at school.
Females are not men.
>
If you take exterior attributes as your defintion of "men", they can be
and will be crafted surgically.
You could surgically attach fake donkey ears and tail to a human, but
that wouldn't make them a donkey.
If you take chromosomes as your definition of "men", there are
historically a number of people who were born as a woman and died as a
woman any you claim they would be men?
..and there are humans who were born with more than two nipples, and
more than, or less then five fingers and toes, too.
-- C'est bonSoloman